So what: Assyr-Aramaic or Aramaic-Assyr ?

[Follow Ups] [Post Followup] [Our Discussion Forum]

Posted by Andreas from dtm2-t8-2.mcbone.net (62.104.210.95) on Wednesday, May 28, 2003 at 2:59PM :

In Reply to: assyrianlanguage.com posted by Sadie from ? (160.129.27.22) on Wednesday, May 28, 2003 at 11:53AM :

So what: Assyr-Aramaic or Aramaic-Assyr ?

What's the language really ?

Sadie,

See the pic above

BTW & FYI:
That's basically a mini-hack I've done [I think it was for the good purpose of evidencing and (en)lightening].

Though the webmaster Aldawood has disabled/locked any pic downloading from his
ridiculous site, voilà - here is the evidence we need for our conversation.

Now on your message:

: Wow, just found this site by accident....

+++ In your case always an accident.

: WHY is there a U.S. flag on that introductory page? Hm?

+++ Be happy: So the low standard of that site goes under the US flag.

:If I was living in the Mid East or Europe or elsewhere & I visited that
page, it would make me feel a bit weird to see that flag (of all flags) on
that webpage,

+++ Weird?
I'd say unprofessional and arrogating.

: instead of something more global

+++ Global, you said?
Yeah! Oui! Si! Sim! Da! Ja! Ken! Evet! Na'am ! Aiwa! Jo! Igen! Ba'leh....

: or "Assyrian" in spirit.

+++ Gulp...

+++ But above all:
What now exactly?

Either "Assyrian-Aramaic" or "Aramaic-Assyrian"?

In the website logo (see above) the English text is contradicting the
"Assyrian" one:

1) In Engl:
"Assyrian Aramaic"

i.e. it's ARAMAIC of the Assyrian type (in English: The adjective "Assyrian"
qualifies the noun "ARAMAIC ")

vs

2) In "Assyrian":
"(Lishana) aturaya aramaya"

i.e. its ASSYRIAN of the Aramaic type (in "Assyrian or whatever": The
adjective "Aramaic" qualifies the noun "ASSYRIAN ")

+++ So, what now exactly?

+++ Didn't notice?

+++ So much for the consistence/expertise of that website.

+++ Dear Sadie,

How long will "Assyrians" swallow such incompetence?

PS: Did the sharp Mr Aldawood a "language deal" to get sour-sweet-lookin Susan for at least one night?

+++ Such would be and IS the way history and "science" is being written and continued and petrified as a "fable convenue" or "story of 1000+1 (more or less eventless) nights" as long as there are enough idiots out there to not ask any questions, to not scrutinize and to not use their hearts and brains.

-- Andreas
-- signature .

As usual:Compromised, corrupted, incompetent - Andreas 3:46PM 05/28/2003 () (5)

actually - Sadie 4:48PM 05/28/2003 () (4)
- No, Lady: YOU think now. YOU act now - Andreas 5:08PM 05/28/2003 () (3)
  - actually - Sadie 5:19PM 05/28/2003 () (2)
    - FACT-ually is the wonder word .... - Andreas 5:39PM 05/28/2003 () (1)
      - Re: FACT-ually is the wonder word .... - Sadie 0:23AM 05/29/2003 () (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:	( default )
Subject:
Message:	: : So what: Assyr-Aramaic or Aramaic-Assyr ? : What's the language really ? : Sadie, : See the pic above : BTW & FYI: : That's basically a mini-hack I've done [I think it was for the good purpose of evidencing and (en)lightening]. : Though the webmaster Aldawood has disabled/locked any pic downloading from his : ridiculous site, voilà - here is the evidence we need for our conversation. : Now on your message: : : : Wow, just found this site by accident.... : +++ In your case always an accident. : : : WHY is there a U.S. flag on that introductory page? Hm? : +++ Be happy: So the low standard of that site goes under the US flag. : : :If I was living in the Mid East or Europe or elsewhere & I visited that : page, it would make me feel a bit weird to see that flag (of all flags) on : that webpage, : +++ Weird? : I'd say unprofessional and arrogating. : : instead of something more global : +++ Global, you said? : Yeah! Oui! Si! Sim! Da! Ja! Ken! Evet! Na'am ! Aiwa! Jo! Igen! Ba'leh.... : : or "Assyrian" in spirit. : +++ Gulp... : +++ But above all: : What now exactly? : Either "Assyrian-Aramaic" or "Aramaic-Assyrian"? : In the website logo (see above) the English text is contradicting the : "Assyrian" one: : 1) In Engl: : "Assyrian Aramaic" : i.e. it's ARAMAIC of the Assyrian type (in English: The adjective "Assyrian" : qualifies the noun "ARAMAIC ") : vs : 2) In "Assyrian": : "(Lishana) aturaya aramaya" : i.e. its ASSYRIAN of the Aramaic type (in "Assyrian or whatever": The : adjective "Aramaic" qualifies the noun "ASSYRIAN ") : +++ So, what now exactly? : +++ Didn't notice? : +++ So much for the consistence/expertise of that website. : : +++ Dear Sadie, : How long will "Assyrians" swallow such incompetence? : PS: Did the sharp Mr Aldawood a "language deal" to get sour-sweet-lookin Susan for at least one night? : : +++ Such would be and IS the way history and "science" is being written and continued and petrified as a "fable convenue" or "story of 1000+1 (more or less eventless) nights" as long as there are enough idiots out there to not ask any questions, to not scrutinize and to not use their hearts and brains.

Optional Link ( default )
URL:
Title:
Optional Image Link ( default )
URL:

This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com