Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration

Posted by D from 92.52.26.24.cfl.rr.com (24.26.52.92) on Monday, June 16, 2003 at 3:05PM :

In Reply to: Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration posted by The Cheeta Of Them All from customer-148-233-78-77.uninet.net.mx (148.233.78.77) on Monday, June 16, 2003 at 2:23PM :

Because I felt like it.

-- D
-- signature .

Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration - D 6:08PM 06/16/2003 () (2)
- Well Here... - farid 11:59AM 06/17/2003 () (1)
  - Woohoo! - D 1:03PM 06/17/2003 () (0)

This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com