Posted by farid from customer-148-233-93-84.uninet.net.mx (148.233.93.84) on Wednesday, August 13, 2003 at 1:02PM :
In Reply to: Who looks more regal? posted by Sadie from ? (160.129.27.22) on Wednesday, August 13, 2003 at 12:24PM :
: So, in the picture above, Maria Shriver is 4 years younger than Queen Noor, but one can see the difference in the way each woman respects her body. In my opinion, Queen Noor has a more regal look & the natural fullness of her face makes her look quite angelic (like a cherub) & younger than her age - she's positively gorgeous. Her outfit is elegant - it flows & doesn't display her body like it is something to be gawked at by adolescent-minded men. Rather, it shields her from such idiotic gazes & makes her look powerful, almost intimidating. & that she is wearing very little make-up shows how proud she is of her own natural skin. She may have had some surgeries (I don't know), but they were minimal.
: Maria Shriver, on the other hand, looks positively trashy - like a woman trying to dress as if she was a teenager. Facelifts have made the skin on her face too tight. Her face is caked with makeup (what is she trying to hide?), & her bodice shows too much skin for a woman her age &, in fact, is too tight. Coupled with that ridiculous tan, the effect of the bodice is that it makes her upper body look like a stuffed sausage. She could pass as a Dallas Cowboys cheerleader, not a lady stateswoman. Who can respect someone who clearly doesn't respect herself, her own body?
***Im agree totally...in order of preference I`d wish myself next to Queen Noor...then Arnold...then Maria.
-- farid
-- signature .
Follow Ups: