the mind of a madman |
Posted by
parhad
(Guest)
- Saturday, April 3 2004, 19:04:38 (EST) from 148.233.93.104 - customer-148-233-93-104.uninet-ide.com.mx Mexico - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
someone just sent me this anonymousely. It`s written by Peter Jassim who changed his name to BetBassoo because it would APPEAR more Assyrian and less Muslim. It`s fairly close to being a rough draft chapter of Mein Kampf by that other purist idiot. I barely got through it the first time without gagging. It has to be studied carefully, not for it`s own value, it has none..but sort of as a scat...you know, scatology..the study of turds to determined what the fuck kind of an animal dumped them...this one can lay there and stink for awhile..I`m too weak to attaend to it now. Should have guessed it though...the first thing you think when you meet Peter is that he just came from a mugging in which 14 ghairy apes kicked the crap out of him and he`s still reeling...smiling like a gofball...the guy is nuts I swear.... here tis...............I gather the first part is an intro to whomever he favored with this crap...then comes the crap. > As for public debate, not everything should be debated publicly, in > front of the eyes of our enemies, because the information will be used > against us. Look how the denominational issue is exploited by the Kurds. > Had we kept this issue STRICTLY internal, they would not have used it > against us. It is irresponsible not to consider the consequences of what > one publicly says, because there are always enemies listening. And if > one prides himself as being an intellectual, then it is irresponsible to > discuss anything for anything's sake; a mark of an intellectual is to > know when NOT to say something. > > With the regard to the "Muslim Assyrians" issue, this is doubly > important. Read the article I wrote below. I have never published this > openly. It is spread confidentially to Assyrians I trust. Do not show > this article to untrustworthy individuals. > > ----------------------------------------- > > It is not a question of standing behind my words, of course I can do > that, but it is a question of responsibility. It would be irresponsible > of me to put this idea into the enemy's mind. You do realize that we are > constantly monitored by Turks, Kurds, Arabs and Persians. Three years > ago AINA was cited in a report prepared by the Turkish Intelligence > agency for the Turkish government. > > There are some discussions that must remain internal to our people, and > this is one of them. I do not do this for glory or self-aggrandizement, > there is a higher cause that I serve (which gives me the strength to > bear through it -- it is not easy working for and with our people, you > know). > > --------------------------------------------- > > > The Mortal Danger of the "Muslim Assyrians" > > The question has been asked by Assyrian nationalists: what is to be done > about those Assyrians that have assimilated into the Islamic societies? > Should an effort be made to restore unto them their Assyrian identity > and to bring them into the Assyrian fold? As with any complex question, > the answer is contingent. > > Assyria now lies sundered into four countries: southeast Turkey, > northwest Iran, north Iraq and northeast Syria. The populations of these > countries include Assyrians and non-Assyrians. The non-Assyrians are > Arabs, Turks, Persians and Kurds. There is no question that some of > these non-Assyrians are of Assyrian blood, who have been Islamized and > assimilated into the host cultures. > > Until 630 AD, Assyrians comprised 95% of the population in Assyria. The > coming of Islam would change that, and in the subsequent 1400 years the > demographic changed via the process of assimilation into Muslim > societies. Today Assyrians comprise only about 8% of the population in > Assyria. > > The crucial distinction between Assyrians and their host societies, > besides ethnicity, is religion: Assyrians are Christians, whereas all of > the others are Muslims. This has served as an effective barrier against > assimilation into Christian Assyrian societies, but not into Muslim > non-Assyrian societies. Assyrians have assimilated in significant > numbers into Muslim societies, but non-Assyrians have not assimilated > into Assyrian society, as illustrated by the dramatic drop of the > Assyrian population in the last 1400 years. This has preserved the > purity of the Christian Assyrian bloodlines. > > The culture of these "Muslim Assyrians" has diverged from the culture of > the Christian Assyrians in proportion to the time of their assimilation > into Islamic societies. It is known, for example, that the Tikreeties > are Assyrians, as are the Barzanis. The Tikreeties assimilated into > Arab/Muslim society three centuries ago; the Barzanis into > Kurdish/Muslim society only one century ago; yet both are now firmly and > thoroughly rooted in their Muslim societies and there can be no hope of > their recovery. Even in the case of the Barzanis, so recently > assimilated, the hope of recovery is irrevocably lost. > > The chain of continuity of the Assyrian culture and bloodlines is > preserved in the Christian Assyrians. The "Muslim Assyrians", on the > other hand, broke that chain when they embraced Islam, for it was a > wholesale transplantation not only of religion, but of culture, identity > and eventually bloodlines, because the religious barrier was removed, > and a Muslim was free to marry any other Muslim, regardless of ethnicity. > > The cultural differences between the Christian and Muslim Assyrians are > strong and powerful, and those differences should not be underestimated > -- they present an unbridgeable gap. Consider the difficulty of uniting > the Christian Assyrian denominations (still not accomplished). How can > one hope to unite Muslims and Christians under one ideology, > Assyrianism, which explicitly and implicitly opposes the Arabist/Islamic > ideology? It must be remembered that in the Middle East the coupling > strength of Arabism and Islam is well nigh unbreakable, and a Muslim is > inexorably drawn into the Arab black hole. > > In the final analysis, a Muslim Assyrian will turn toward Mecca, and a > Christian Assyrian toward Nineveh. These are irreconcilable centrifugal > forces that will tear asunder any such unity, and likely destroy us in > the process. > > If Assyrians had a strong and solid state, with governments and > institutions, schools and universities, media and economic markets, the > answer would be: from this position of strength, Assyrians should > attempt to bring back the Muslim Assyrians, but only if they converted > to Christianity and learned to speak, read and write Assyrian (the > language of the Assyrian state), for if they did none of these things, > they would become a centrifugal force, creating great internal division > and weakening and perhaps ultimately destroying the Assyrian state from > within. > > But since Assyrians have no state and lack these resources, what should > be done? The answer must be pragmatic and realistic: we are now a very > weak people, and we cannot even unite ourselves, much less bring > radically different elements into our fold. We have not the resources to > pursue this path, and we should not, for there is mortal danger in it: > expropriation and co-opting of Assyrianism, numerical nullification of > our cause and the introduction of Fifth Columns into our folds. > > Imagine if all Muslim Iraqis suddenly acknowledged that they are > Assyrians, and decided to change the name of Iraq to Assyria. They would > claim that they are Assyrians, and they are the children of Sargon and > Ashurbanipal; they would restore and rebuild the Assyrian archaeological > sites, take pride in their rich heritage, and go on the Hajj every year. > What has changed? Nothing for us; we would still be the persecuted > Christian minority, denied its ethnic and civil rights. They would deny > that we are Assyrians, they would claim that they are the real > Assyrians, and the claim would not be false for a lot of them. But what > of us? Would their Islamic intolerance leave them? Would they allow us > to teach our language and history? Why should we expect 1400 years of > Islamic culture to be suddenly swept away by their newly found > Assyrianism? Old habits die hard. Islam is intolerant of other > religions, and this would not change by the reawakening of these "Muslim > Assyrians". We would still be "those Christians." > > This scenario, of course, is unlikely to happen, but here is a dangerous > scenario much more likely to occur: anti-Assyrian governments and groups > can use this as a wedge into our movement. It is possible, for example, > for Iraq to sponsor a group of "Muslim Assyrians" and use that group as > a Fifth Column to retard and possibly nullify the Assyrian movement. The > Fifth Column would divert whatever resources we have into fighting it, > and would prevent us from working on the real and pressing issues; we > would be thrown into the quagmire of attempting to reconcile two > fundamentally irreconcilable groups. Indeed, our enemies are already > using a similar tactic with our denominations. The very existence of > two "Assyrian" groups, one Muslim and one Christian, would greatly > damage our credibility and our case, and would throw doubt into the mind > of any potential ally. If we call for civil rights for Assyrians in > Iraq, the Fifth Column would claim, as Assyrians, that they have civil > rights. If we ask to teach our language, the Fifth Column would say that > Arabic is our language. The Fifth Column would constantly oppose us, and > effectively halt our progress. In the end, it would boil down to the > Christians versus the Muslims, and it would become a religious issue, > and hence we would be treated as a religious minority. Back to square one. > > Painful as it may be, we must accept the loss of these Muslim Assyrians > and move on with our struggle. These Muslim Assyrians are gone, forever, > and there is no hope of their recovery. > > The Muslim Assyrians are a hornet's nest -- a bomb ready to explode in > our midst. We should not stir this nest nor tinker with this deadly > device, for it will sting us and consume us. As nationalists, we should > have an understanding and agreement amongst ourselves not to discuss > this, and to steer any discussion away from this, and maneuver in such a > way as to prevent our enemies from using against us this most deadly > device. > > Our most powerful defense against this attack is based on the historical > truth: the thread of Assyrian continuity weaves unbroken through the > Christians. The evidence for this is that the Christians assert their > separate ethnicity en masse, but Muslims do not do so (aside from one or > two individuals). This is our best defense. In our occupied homelands > our strength is our uniqueness, and our uniqueness is defined by the > coupling of our Christianity and ethnicity. We must emphasize our > Christian heritage and frame it in the context of ethnic continuity. > Simo Parpola's work points the way, for Christianity itself is an > Assyrian development, and we continued as Assyrians under its guise, > preserving our pre-Christian cultural and linguistic heritage to this day. > > > > > --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: es-mx Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Content-length: 13026 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf/rkvsf_core.php?.OWho. User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmes-mx; MSNc00; v5m) |