The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum
=> Re: Of Legal Daughters and Pulp
| Re: Of Legal Daughters and Pulp |
|
Posted by
The REAL Paul Younan
(Guest)
- Sunday, September 5 2004, 20:12:34 (CEST) from  Commercial -  Windows XP -  Internet ExplorerWebsite: Website title: |
>while we`ve got you on a Sunday and you you feel you must play fair...and before you get tempted by your old Devil again..let me point out that the fetus in a raped woman is not her daughter or son..it isn`t even a Life yet..not in the legal deifinitiona and since you avail yourselves of every legal definition you can when it suits you..let`s give this one some air time. Bullshit. Life begins at conception. The baby has its own genetic makeup different from that of the mother. If the mother is carrying a boy, it does not make the mother a male for nine months. The mother doesn't have a penis for nine months. The baby is of course dependent on the mother for everything, which is of course the case even when it is born. >The drawing of a building is not a building..neither is the first floor without a roof or pipes windows and doors anything you`d accept as the finished house you signed on and paid the contractor for..he can`t tell you to move in because it`s a POTENTIAL house. There's nothing POTENTIAL about a pre-born baby. It is real, not a drawing. It has its own genetic makeup, its own heartbeat by the time most women figure out that they are pregnant. Your drawing analogy is bullshit. >The fetus could not sustain its life outside the mother`s body..it may be a potential life but it isn`t Life yet. Bullshit. The criteria for life is not whether or not someone can sustain their own life....otherwise we would be doing the pagan thing of pushing our elderly relatives off of cliffs and turning off life support to those people who were in recent car accidents. >If the mother chooses to abort..she isn`t killing a daughter or son...the fetus isn`t either yet..not in any rational sense and before you tell us, we all know that religion isn`t rational..we accpet your handicap already...no need to remind us. Since the potential child is only a potentiality...and since men give thesmselves the right to terminate real living children and their mothers...a mother has the same right to terminate what isn`t even a child yet. At what point in your evil little mind does the child become a "child yet?" As you probably don't know, a baby is viable after 7 months...of course they may need a respirator and some feeding tube to survive...but survive they do, and all the time. So I'm very curious to know - where do you draw your neo-Pagan line between life and non-life? >Like I said..start at the most horrendous crimes and work your way down to a poor single mother..or ANY mother who has a fun abortion...don`t START with her...she`s been fucked already by men. You're talking about 1% of the cases of abortion. Again, you bring up the most minor of issues when you ignore the larger issue. Rapes and health of the mother rank a mere 4% of the cases of abortion...according to YOUR "Planned Parenthood" abortion-mill factory. Let's talk about the other 96% - what do you say about those? -Paul --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
|
Content-length: 3379 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?Of_Legal_Daughters_and_Pulp-0ITm.PVfy.QUOTE User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) |
Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9