The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> Re: response to dear lady :part two

Re: response to dear lady :part two

Posted by Dalale (Guest) - Saturday, July 24 2004, 5:28:30 (CEST)
from

Canada -

Windows XP -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

Dalale wrote:
>Mr. Parhad,
>
>If you have read translations of cuneiform text, then you must know that there is a God, as well as Angels of God or Higher Spiritual Beings since cuneiform text's that have been translated refer to GOD and such beings.

...I know that men...and I do mean men...created god in their image...anything less would be an insult to the deiety. I don´t buy other people´s rituals..the holiest bastard sweetheart of them all said live a good life..try to do good...forget the gods...or sort of...that would be Socretes..a far better human bean than Jesus was...though he was a good egg in his own way.

******* I've never encountered a human being as stubborn as me! I guess there's a frist for everything! I would guess your zodiac sign but I don't want to give you a heart attack when I guess right...do you ever change your mind Mr. Parhad....? Your the one that's saying we should follow the religion our ancestors followed, yet when I bring up some points about what cuneiform text actually states, you twist my words to suit yourself. Cuneiform text says there is a GOd who created us in his image, not the other way around, you say there is no God and that we created him in our image, that means that you don't follow our ancient religion, not Ashur nor any other God.

Here you are saying that I don't believe in Ashur, meanwhile I believe he was a living breathing Higher Spiritual Being, while you think he was just a hallucination made up by the Assyrians which we should follow just because we hallucinated him!

...I think your Jesus is a hallucination...Ashur was inspiration...Jesus is resignation...

***** Your the one that said you don't believe in any God, I never said Ashur was a hallucination, it's what you consider him, a "made up" (hallucinated) deity!

>There are interrelated issues concerning Anu, Ashur, and many of the Olden God(s).........and I can even see a link with Christ, but this type of statement needs to be backed up by quotes and facts, or else you will disregard it and call it silly.

...your every attempt to legitimize us by dragging Jesus over is silly..I don´t care what you think you prove...Assyrians needed nothing Jesus had to offer..on the contrary we saved his ass.

*****I'm not going to try to prove anything because no matter what I try to "prove" you have your own version of "truth" , and I guess everyone does these days. I have always tried to figured out all of the answers to my "why" "when" "where" questions on my own, so I figure anyone who want's to find out about anything will do so on his own, if it's meant for him to know, he will! You should read a little more about the stories/epics written on clay tablets by our ancestors. Those men and women you sculpted and their ancestors, really did write much more then contracts and shopping lists!

>So I will get back to your post and this issue after I sharpen my sword! hh kidding! (Got to get to work for now). By the way, I ASSURE you, I passed grade school with flying colors!
>
>You might like this link: http://killeenroos.com/1/SUMEGODS.htm#I.%20Overview%20(including%20regional

..that´s good..I dropped out.

*** Are all grade school drop outs as stubborn as you?

**** Mr. Parhad artist's are supposed to hate politics, when did you become interested in it?

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:

response to dear lady parhad - Wednesday, July 21 2004, 18:11:35 (CEST)
- Re: response to dear lady :part two parhad - 07/21 18:13
  - Re: response to dear lady :part two Dalale - 07/22 00:07
    - Re: response to dear lady :part two parhad - 07/23 02:06
      - Re: response to dear lady :part two Dalale - 07/23 07:01
    - Re: response to dear lady :part two parhad - 07/23 19:15
      - Re: response to dear lady :part two Dalale - 07/23 21:01
        Re: response to dear lady :part two parhad - 07/24 04:31
        Re: response to dear lady :part two Dalale - 07/24 05:28
        Re: response to dear lady :part two Tiglath - 07/24 15:36
        Re: response to dear lady :part two Dalale - 07/24 18:14
        Re: response to dear lady :part two Tiglath - 07/25 04:56
        Re: response to dear lady :part two Dalale - 07/25 05:47
        You can't be serious? Tiglath - 07/25 07:27
        Re: You can't be serious? Dalale - 07/25 17:51
        Re: You can't be serious? Jeff - 07/25 19:20
        Re: You can't be serious? Dalale - 07/25 22:39
        
        Re: You can't be serious? Habibi - 07/25 20:01
        Re: You can't be serious? Dalale - 07/25 22:41
        My point Habibi - 07/25 23:34
        Re: My point Dalale - 07/26 02:29
        Re: My point Habibi - 07/26 03:25
        Re: My point Dalale - 07/26 04:35
        Re: My point Habibi - 07/26 04:55
        Re: My point Dalale - 07/26 05:07
        Re: My point Habibi - 07/26 05:12
        
        Re: My point Habibi - 07/26 03:34
        Re: My point Dalale - 07/26 04:57
        I double, triple, quadruple dare you to Habibi - 07/26 05:17
      - Re: response to dear lady :part two My Reply Mr. Parhad Dalale - 07/25 02:34

Content-length: 3923
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-ca
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?Re_response_to_dear_lady_part_two-19Dy.CEVb.REPLY
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)