The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> The Heart Of The Matter

Posted by parhad (Guest) - Tuesday, June 22 2004, 5:41:14 (CEST)
from -

Windows XP -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

This article is what this thing is all about...it`s the same end-run Hitler made when he declared the German eople wre under attack b nefarious forces..only his hated people of choice were Jews..and Bush has targeted Muslims...the same thing will happen..in the end, Bush will harm Americans more thahn any Muslims ever did, or ever intended to...and Hitler caused the death of more Germans and the ruin of more German roperty then any Jews ever could have or thought to or wanted to.

This Terrorist bullshit...like the Commie under every bed bullshit that sank all our money in a big hole the last fifty years...its what Bush and company need to hog tie the US Constitution. It`s Bush and the Conservative Christians who are attacking America...

Lawyers' Rights Tested in U.S. Terror Cases

Mon Jun 21, 7:31 PM ET Add U.S. National - Reuters to My Yahoo!

By Gail Appleson

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A controversial case pitting a lawyer's freedom to represent clients against what many see as a Bush administration attempt to chip away at civil rights in the name of fighting terrorism will go to trial this week.

AP Photo

The prosecution of Lynne Stewart, a well-known New York civil rights lawyer, has triggered an uproar among American defense attorneys who say it represents a dangerous strike against a lawyer's ability to fully represent a client.

"It strikes deep into the hearts of lawyers everywhere," said Jeffrey Fogel, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights.

"It is an extraordinary attack on the legal system because it attacks the independent voice of lawyers and the cherished right for attorneys to have confidential conversations with their clients," he added.

Stewart is accused of breaking the law by helping her imprisoned client, Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, a radical Muslim cleric, communicate with the Islamic Group. Prosecutors say the group is a terrorist organization that sees the cleric as its spiritual leader.

Abdel-Rahman is serving a life sentence after being convicted in 1995 of urging followers to bomb U.S. landmarks, including the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center.

A jury of eight women and four men were selected by the end of the afternoon on Monday and opening statements are set to begin on Tuesday morning. The panel is anonymous with jurors' names and personal information being kept confidential.

The charges allege that, after 1997, Stewart helped Abdel-Rahman violate prison restrictions aimed at stopping him from passing on communications that could result in violence. The measures restricted his access to mail, the media, telephones and visitors.

Among the allegations is that Stewart told a Reuters reporter in 2000 that the cleric had withdrawn his support for the Islamic Group's cease-fire in Egypt.

'DEPLORABLE CONDUCT'

While many lawyers are critical of the case, some say Stewart is no heroine. Sherry Colb, a Rutgers law professor, wrote an article last year saying Stewart is accused of communicating an order to kill people.

"This is deplorable conduct," she wrote. "It further brings shame to a profession that depends on lawyers' ability to remember that no matter what anyone says of us, we are not and must never become hired guns."

But others say Stewart was carrying out her pledged duty to defend her client and that evidence against her, which includes hours of government taped conversations with her imprisoned client, violates attorney client confidentiality.

They also believe the 64-year-old Stewart, a familiar figure in New York courts, is being singled out because she has a reputation as a left-leaning lawyer and political activist who has represented unpopular clients.

"No doubt they wanted to target her because of her clients," Fogel said, adding that the case might scare other lawyers from taking terrorism-related cases.

Gerald Lefcourt, a past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said those who do take such cases might not be as zealous as they should be.

"It is already having a chilling effect," he said, explaining that lawyers who take terrorism cases fear their conversations will be intercepted by the government and thus will not have frank discussions with their clients.

"What's the point of having an attorney if you can't have confidences," he said.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:
No replies.

Content-length: 5076
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: es-mx
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?.6Tit.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmes-mx; MSNc00; v5m)