The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> getting close...

Posted by parhad (Guest) - Monday, June 21 2004, 16:17:27 (CEST)
from -

Windows XP -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

..to actually admitting what Bush and American corporations are up to in the MidEast..that this is all a prelude to war...but different kind..in which we starve the children...hammer the parents for years an then move in for the kill.

The lies are thick and fast...that`s the whole idea. Who speaks truth any longer?

...an article:

When the world's nuclear watchdog gets it wrong on Iran, watch the US

Friday, June 18, 2004

What happens when a United Nations organization gets it wrong?

..just have to interject: They didn`t "get it wrong". The UN is an American Front.

When the error is as significant as the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) June report that Iran withheld information on its nuclear programs, the implications can be serious.

Iran has been under pressure for years over allegations - mostly from the United States and Israel - that it has been developing nuclear weapons under the cloak of a nuclear energy program. It has recently been criticized by the IAEA and the US for its programs and for its alleged non-cooperation with IAEA fact-finding missions. Thus, when the IAEA admitted Thursday that Tehran had indeed informed it about the importation of magnets for advanced centrifuges capable of producing weapons-grade uranium, the case of those pointing an accusing finger is weakened.

Even as Iran's reformers struggled with policies that would have seen the gulf between Washington and Tehran dramatically reduced, US hostility has continued unabated. More than this, however, is what such an event as the IAEA "error" on Iran's cooperation implies for the region as a whole. It does not augur well. Iran's stand on its nuclear programs has not been taken seriously - just as the aspirations of other states and peoples in the Middle East have not been taken seriously.

As Iraqis prepare to take charge of their own destiny at the end of this month, all eyes will be casting regular glances at the United States to see what role it will play at this delicate juncture in the region's history. Belligerence has been the order of the day and not, as we have seen, just in Iraq. As in all matters of its Middle East policy, Washington has choices to make: Will it continue its confrontational stance, bulldozing through the region as it sees fit? Or will it take a more conciliatory stance that takes into consideration regional realities and sensibilities?

While the US continues to provide unabated support for the nuclear-armed imperial state that is Israel while constantly battering Iran over its nuclear energy programs, the signs are that belligerence will remain the order of the day.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:
No replies.

Content-length: 3088
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: es-mx
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?.3BOm.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmes-mx; MSNc00; v5m)