The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> pro-life vs pro-choice...battle or words.

pro-life vs pro-choice...battle or words.
Posted by Parhad (Guest) - Thursday, September 16 2004, 18:54:54 (CEST)
from 200.94.234.149 - 200.94.234.149 - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

The people who were for the legalization of abortions realized quickly that to allow themselves to be called "PRO-abortion" was a silly mistake....something that sounds innocent enough but was quickly turned into the kind of emotional supository Paul has up his arse.

Who, in their right mind is PRO-death? Women know better than anyone what an abortion costs them..they know it will always haunt them..but better a ghost than a living presence they can`t handle and don`t want...so much of Life is choosing the lesser of several evils.

So they changed their name to "pro-choice"...which sounds much more like what they actually promote..it`s not like they`re a bunch of Amazons running around insisting tht ALL women have abortions! They merely want the choice for a legal one to be available...whether half the women use it or none do..the point is that it SHOULD be available.

Funny thing is that while the pro-choice movement becamse a little clearer and more honest in what they are asking for..the other side hasn`t followed suit.

What the pro-life people really advocate is more death. They are for the fetus, but against the mother who opts for killing her fetus...while the fetus dies regardless...whether abortion id legal or not..it is the so called "pro" life people whose policies would lead to MORE murder..for to have an unlicensed person attempt to do what the medical profession says a qualified doctor must do..is advocating murder...which is what it would be if I attempted open-heart surgery...I couldn`t say I was doing my "best" under the circumstances...when there are qualified surgeons who could have done it..we aren`t talking about battlefield conditions here...we`re talking about women being forced to walk right past the latest hosptials and clinics, around the corner and into a back alley to have a quack operate with a coat hanger...

If we were stuck in battle and I HAD to operate on someone..and she dies..it wouldn`t be murder..not if there was no choice and we knew that. In a battlefield a woman might need an abortion with a coat hanger..but we don`t want to keep her in a battlefield.

To be more accurate the pro-life movement should be called the pro-death movement...for their "morality" results in more deaths..not less.

Sure..we all know and always did that the woman COULD have the child..she COULD raise it..she COULD give it up for adoption...she COULD give it to relatives...these options were available for the last 4000 years as well...but obviously they don`t cover all cases..obviously women go on having abortions...no matter the law or the risks..that being the case, the pro-choice movement decided to make legal and clean abortions availible..as a matter of choice...not imposed on anyone...just "there". This has cut down or eliminated women being murdered by quacks...to make it illegal again...as Paul wants..won`t save a single fetus..but even if it kills a single woman...his movement with its FIXED morality will mean more deaths..and deaths easily prevented..and in these circumstances..that amounts to murder too.....

...we want less death...he wants more. That simple.



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 3513
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: es-mx
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?.5AFy.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmes-mx; MSNc00; v5m)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9