Re: unintelligent design... |
Posted by
Jeff
(Guest)
jeff@attoz.com
- Sunday, August 7 2005, 7:17:38 (CEST) from 69.14.30.71 - d14-69-71-30.try.wideopenwest.com Commercial - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
Some religious nut was on the Diane Rehm show recently trying to say that Intelligent Design was NOT a religious viewpoint. Her other, sane guest pointed out to him that "Intelligent Design, by virtue of its name, requires a DESIGNER...thereby MAKING it a religious viewpoint. End of story." Religious nuts are such nuts. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 560 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Connection: keep-alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Keep-alive: 300 Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf3/rkvsf_core.php?unintelligent_design-1KLa.BVox.REPLY User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.9) Gecko/20050711 Firefox/1.0.5 |