AssyrianMuslim, SORRY you are DEAD WRONG |
Posted by
Jumblat
(Guest)
- Monday, May 26 2008, 0:58:54 (CEST) from 69.219.148.166 - ppp-69-219-148-166.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
The AssyrianMuslim wrote: "You can never physically prove the nice miracles attributed to Jesus but I can feel and touch the miracle given to Muhammad. REPLY>>> Jesus spoke to God and performed miracles as a vessel of God while Muhammad only received "revelations" from God which you cannot prove either. Your feelings mean nothing to me or anyone else. There is a big difference between the two, one who performs miracles himself on behalf of God and the other whom receives "revelations" and performs nothing. I too can say God has spoken to me, but how can you prove otherwise? I may feel the touch of God so what would disprove this? After all I'm not performing any miracles and you must take me at my word. The AssyrianM again: There are few million Arab Christians they could have easily tried to produce something like the Quran since they so attack Muslims yet they have not been able to produce a master piece in the Arabic language, the rythm, flow, poetic and most of all untouched and memorized by millions from cover to cover by folks of all ages and backgrounds. REPLY>>> The Bible was written long before the Qur'an and is not a book of poetry or rhymes. It's the word of God and if anyone complains they are bored of reading God's divinity onto mankind because it's not poetic or rhythmic than you are not a true believer. This isn't a competition of who has a better style of writing. This is about the word of God which should not be mocked. AssyrianM: You can continue changing your porno book all you like, but we can't and we wouldn't even if we could do that because we know who is its source and author. No wonder Allah didn't pick a Christian or an Assyrian to reveal the Quran to but He knew who to reveal it to. the Arabs were faithful and have faithfully respected and taken care of the Quran. You are a liar and a kaffir. I would freaking eat you alive if we ever stepped toe to toe in a ring to debate this subject or the anything you run away from. REPLY >>> Actually the writing style of Qur'an is not an respectable Arabic method of writing. This was done in an era of Arabic literature that was called 'عصر الانحطاط. Here is a sample of the your Qur'an which shows how badly it was written. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم قل اعوذ برب الناس ملك الناس اله الناس من شر الوسواس الخناس الذي يوسوس في صدور الناس من الجنة والناس --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 4127 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.157u. Ua-cpu: x86 User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) |