Christian tactics |
Posted by
AssyrianMuslim
(Guest)
- Friday, January 16 2009, 2:23:43 (CET) from 74.129.168.90 - 74-129-168-90.dhcp.insightbb.com Commercial - Windows Codename Longhorn - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
The tactics never change when it comes to Jumblat's type of christians and their dealing with Islam. They can't just stick to one subject or topic but instead they'll throw all kinds of stuff and expect to answer them all and they are not even going to read or listen. It is like a waste of time to even get engaged in that. They can't stick to the topic they bring up but they'll mention other things which will take an entire lecture to explain and they aren't even going to listen nor do they care. That is a mockery and that is exactly what the jack ass on here has been doing. I have been posting on here for over a year now and God knows how long Pancho has been dealing with this clown, but he has yet given answers to the two questions asked. No answers, no evidence and just a bunch of his opinions, statements and bigotry. If you don't like Islam, that is your business, and as the Quran says "lakum dinukum waliya deen" "to you be your way and to me be my". But when you make slandering comments, you will be challenged and expected to answer. In the mind of the christian, others can't question them but have to show them respect and answer their questions which aren't even questions anyway. They make a statement, a false statement on top of that, they place a question mark behind it and expect a "yes" or "no" answer. They won't even let you clean up the mess first or give you a chance to correct them. Everytime you try to explain, they'll say "oh no, no, yes or no", and this is bull shit. It's like asking a person whose mother is not even in jail "is your mother out of jail yet, yes or no question" and you try to answer that your mother is not even in jail, and they keep saying "naw uh, yes or no answer" but my mother is not in jail, and same thing again they want a yes or no answer to a question that contains a false statement and has a question mark behind it. If I go up to a Christian and say "why does your religion kill people for refusing to accept Christ" that is not a real question but rather a statement because I am already saying that they do it and I am only asking him why. However, if I were to say "does your religion expect you to force your religion down my thraot" now that is a question and the poor individual can answer, but what these jack asses are doing is making statements and their opinions, which they consider "solid facts" and then expect you to answer yes or no to their statements. This is not fair and the christian would allow himself to be in such a position yet he expects us to do so because they think we are "lost heatens". If they stick to the subject instead of moving from subject to subject and making false statements, it will make it a lot easier to have a debate but it is impossible to have a debate when the person is only interested in lyingm slandering, making statements, changing the subject and avoiding answering or providing evidence for the statement. I have never back down from any subject brought up by a Christian. Whether a debate or a friendly dialogue or any kind of dialogue, I am all for it but it has to be the subject brought up and agreed on and not just jump from topic to topic or be like this jack ass on here who has nothing to say but dropp off his opinions, family inherited bigotry, hatred and false statements. If this is all they want to do, then I am not going to participate because opinions don't mean anything, but a statement or claim is different and there has to be proof for it. What my aunty, father or child hood priest or nun told me does not mean anything if it is false or has no basis. Sticking to the subject is the best way and picking a topic and then we can have a debate. The current topic was never the Quran or Arabic language but the topic is Islam spread by forced conversions and killed people just for religion. This is what we have been proving to be false and we showed that it was Christianity that done so and it is Christians who killed people for religion and forced conversions. This is not my opinion, but there are books, documentaries and most of all it is Christian historians who testify of this, and one was even a Catholic priest and eye witness to what he saw the Spanish do to the Natives of Americas. I am not going to be fooled by these Christians and expect me to spent my energy and time responding to their bogus statements and then they are not even going to read or even want to learn. What in the world is a debate to these people I wonder. They expect people to just accept their opinions and nothing else. Or do they think a debate is expressing and ejaculating your opinions and expect people to answer or waste time with it. If it is an opinion, then it isn't an issue nor important but it becomes a different story when that opinion and false statement suddenly is expected to be accepted as a "solid fact". My own cousin tried to do that with me and he failed. He sat for nearly 2 hours slandering Islam and the prophet. He made false statements after statement and after I refuted each one, he said it is only "his opinion". I wanted to reach through the computer and choke him for wasting my time. He didn't want to hear me reply to anything he was saying but only listen. It's like telling a person let me pound your ass and you don't fight back or even raise your arms to protect yourself. Just stand there and allow me to beat you but do not get involved. what type of crap is this that these type of Christians like to pull? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 5908 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-application, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument, appli... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.CObf. Ua-cpu: x86 User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506) |