The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Fuat Who?

Posted by pancho (Guest) - Tuesday, April 15 2008, 1:59:38 (CEST)
from 69.235.36.99 - adsl-69-235-36-99.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net

Network -

Mac OS X -

Safari
Website:
Website title:

The murder of Fuat certainly qualifies as a tragedy. But that his murderer turned out to be a Christian Assyrian can be called a catastrophe. It's bad enough that a Christian killed him, thereby robbing us of an educated and talented professional, of which we have way too few, but that he wasn't killed by a Muslim robs us of what we value even more...what we claim has "saved us" and gotten us to where we are now, which is decidedly NOT educated people but Martyrs...and you can't have a Christrian Martyr if a Christian kills him...therefore the loss of Fuat Deniz is a real tragedy AND a catastrophe.

And yet...the claim that he was killed by one of us and a member of his own family for "personal reasons" doesn't sit right either. The idea of a Muslim killer has been put to rest but what we're left with doesn't feel right either. For one thing it's suspiciously close to the explanation given by the Christian who murdered Marshimun in San Jose, California....who said it was a personal matter...a question of "insults"(yes, THAT word) which Marshimun had supposedly directed at his killer's father...it would be just like us to explain murder by appealing to our sense of being insulted.

But clearly that was a ruse...something which was thought to explain away this terrible murder of a man in the act of bathing his young son with his wife and another child present. Such a crime requires more than an "I felt insulted" plea. Marshimun had basically told the church to stuff it...that he was going to do the noble thing and marry the woman he loved and have children with her, rather than keep her for a mistress as the rest of our holy men do. It's more likely that this "insult" and exposure of the hypocrisy of the clergy was really behind his murder...it was an affront to the Church and the whoring of its prelates which brought about his murder...a murder most gruesome, with his family present.

I think Fuat was murdered for something similar. Though much national hope was placed in his being murdered by Muslims, a Turk preferably, because of his "research" into the tired old claims that the Turks committed genocide and mass murder against Assyrians, it may well have been just the opposite which enraged the community so much that an avenger was called for. perhaps, as a university graduate, a professor, our community felt they at last had someone who could at least spell and who might command some respect for the off-the-wall claims our lunkheads produce as to the so-called genocide we endured. Maybe they tried and failed to recruit Deniz to their point of view and saw in him not an educated champion of their ludicrous claims but rather just the opposite; an educated and respected professional who disagreed with their reading of "history". If that was the case then Deniz would become an "enemy of Assyria" and just ignoring him would not be enough....his very silence even would be condemnation, let alone his active opposition. Just knowing that such a man refused to share these ditzy views and hold these self-serving opinions would explain not only the need to eliminate him but also the terribly clumsy and public way in which it was done.

Far from wanting to get away with anything, the killer wanted to publicize the murder...even to the point of killing Deniz with a knife to his neck...something another hothead jackass opined earlier was proof a Muslim must have done it...because "we all know" how Muslims like to slit throats.

I'd say that Marshimun wasn't murdered because of insults his killer couldn't ignore and had to take such drastic measured against...at least not personal insults, but some great and grand and all-encompasing insult aimed at the very core of our silly national/religious beliefs, which include the chastity of our clergy and Marshimun's refusal to play along with business as usual. Similarly I doubt it was a personal feud which led to Fuat's murder but rather an ongoing argument about his usefullness to the Assyrian "cause"...something he refused to lend himself to and thereby damaged. For Aprim's claims to be verified, someone with some academic standing, which Aprim has none of, would be useful...likewise if someone with such standing were to refuse involvement it would strike at the very heart of only one, though a major one, of our bogus claims. Such a man could not simply be ignored as one who is "ignorant" and therefore doesn't matter and can be safely passed over...his continued existence and refusal to join in condemning the Turks would be a constant reminder that these claims are false and not to be seriously taken.

The fact that Deniz was killed in a way we claim the hated Arabs kill...the fact that a Christian would adopt the preferred method of a Muslim murderer, according to us, shows how strong was the hatred felt for Deniz...not by any Muslim but by us.

We are the enemy...no one else.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:
No replies.

Content-length: 5310
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.5BUV.
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/523.12.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/523.12.2