Harris in debate... |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Tuesday, December 23 2014, 17:56:27 (UTC) from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
...again he takes off after Islam saying it is a threat to all of us, not ALL Muslims but the religion itself carries within it the call to mass killing etc. For the life of me I don't know how a scientist can make such a claim.... If Islam was so violent where was its violence over the centuries past? Why wasn't Islam attacking Britain and Germany and Italy and China and the US in all those years...and why isn't it attacking Latin America or Greenland today? is it just coincidence that whatever attacks are directed by Muslims today are chiefly against the two super colonial powers the US and Britain? A Muslim attacked a Dane...why? He was wrong of course...but why did he choose THAT Dane? because that Dane had DONE something he didn't like...ok, it was wrong, but there was a REASON, and that reason had a religious motivation....but how many Christian attacks have also had religious motivation? And if that Muslim was wrong to kill a Dane, how does the Christian US excuse itself for killing 700,000 Iraqi children? What was THEIR reason? Was it any better than the Muslim's reason for killing one Dane? Another sure way to know that Islam is not a violent religion is to ask what weapons systems have Muslims developed over the years with which to carry out this violence? Anyone looking down from the sky would notice that America is bristling with weapons and factories and missiles and rockets and drones and battleships and submarines...where is there anything like that in Muslim history? Who makes and sells the greatest number of weapons to the world...Muslim nations or Christian ones? --------------------- |
The full topic: No replies. |
*** |