The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Interesting comments from this article...

Interesting comments from this article...

Posted by Jeffrey (Guest) - Sunday, August 14 2016, 20:04:22 (UTC) from 173.13.27.45 - 173-13-27-45-Michigan.hfc.comcastbusiness.net Network - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title:

267 comments Foreign Policy Journal Join the discussion… ramoncramon • 7 months ago If any of this is true, Hillary should hang. 82 Reply Share › Jamie ramoncramon • 7 months ago Sarkozy too. 56 Reply Share › cocky Pete ramoncramon • 7 months ago It's all true. War criminals par excellénce 46 • Reply • Share › Areminder cocky Pete • 7 months ago The Foreign Press covered much of this at the time, but you had to visit their sites and Patriot News Sites to find it. 20 Reply Share › Ganesh ramoncramon • 7 months ago https://www.foia.state.gov/sea... It's true. 23 • Reply • Share › Juan TwoTree Ganesh • 7 months ago Thanks Ganesh for the website link! This filthy LIEING wasted piece of the female antomy needs to be in a Federal prison, RIGHT NOW! This 'Boar Hog' LIAR contines to go on CNN, MSNBC, NBC and lies in every interview. Who's holding up throwing her in jail for treason and fraud?? Not Trey Gowdy for sure...it is probably that fuking idiot Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland) who ignores facts from witnesses, from her testimony to Congress and the thousand of e-mails! She has broken at least a dozen or more Federal Laws.This LIAR b*tch needs to go down HARD and bounce her out of her lieing campaign for President Would love to see Trump take on Bernie Sanders!! It would be a blood bath for Sanders! 11 Reply Share › Akin Aina Juan TwoTree • 4 months ago This woman Hillary Clinton is heartless, a peaceful country was turned to war zone, the rest is history. She and other conspirators should be charged for war crime, period 10 Reply Share › Cameron Douglas Akin Aina • 3 months ago Don't forget....George Bush, Dick Cheney & Donald Rumsfeld too! They did the same to Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Saddam gave in to everything Bush demanded, but Bush was hell bent on going to war in Iraq. In fact Iraq had agreed to give private contracts for everything to NATO/US businesses...health care & health/hospital equipment, pharmaceuticals & many other areas of business....including agreeing to buy 1 million Ford cars a year for 10 years. They had agreed to give almost everything they possibly could to get the false sanctions against Iraq removed. Do a search for "Susan Lindauer CIA whistleblower" if you haven't heard her side of things yet. MSM has given her story zero coverage. 8 Reply Share › John Lock Cameron Douglas • 18 days ago Silly comment the Bush attack was UN authorized and authorized by Congress. There is no Bush did it too here now is there. No Congress and No UN authorization. Hillary lies again. 2 Reply Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod John Lock • 18 days ago No, the UN did not authorize the US war on Iraq, which was under international law a war of aggression, "the supreme international law", as defined at Nuremberg. Nor can Congress "authorize" the Executive Branch to violate international law. Reply Share › Vinnie S Cameron Douglas • a month ago Why can't you liberal assholes ever accept Hillary is a corrupt lying self serving POS without saying well others did it so it's okay. 1 • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas Vinnie S • a month ago First off ..I'm not a liberal or an asshole. And I wasn't saying "others did it so it's ok". I just like to make sure we don't forget those other assholes! It's important not to forget what all of them have done. It's not too late to arrest and prosecute every one of them for war crimes, treason, and God knows plenty more! Try not to read into things. You made yourself look like an asshole by running your mouth off. 2 Reply Share › lolana Juan TwoTree • 4 months ago So are you like one of these people who thinks it is OK when Republicans do it, but not Democrats? Why does it even matter? Seriously Trump? The guy who praised the Chinese for shooting protesters at Tienanmen Square? 8 • Reply • Share › jai lolana • 4 months ago What I heard did not exactly sound like praise. And it was by the Chinese, and did not involve the U.S. as supposedly represented by Hillary. 1 Reply Share › true lies Juan TwoTree • 5 months ago I doubt it but there may be enough idiots to vote Trump 1 • Reply • Share › Lisa Gunther true lies • 2 months ago Jebus, we can only hope. He is as dumb as a box of rocks. 1 Reply Share › Cameron Douglas true lies • 3 months ago Almost all Arabs in the middle east are hoping and praying Trump is elected. They know he is for peace and not a warmonger. He is not part of the US whores/establishment/globalists that have infiltrated our gov't. The middle east is stunned with wonder over the massive amount of killing of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of troops and civilians. For what? They don't understand. They can't believe it can be only for money, gold and oil. They are all hoping and praying. 1 • Reply • Share › Lisa Gunther Cameron Douglas • 2 months ago Do not wish for Donald to be president: he will take us into war again because he is that stupid. He has no understanding of foreign policy, the monetary policy, or any thing else. This is a nightmare for the people of the US. 2 Reply Share › Cameron Douglas Lisa Gunther • 2 months ago And you are just a paid globalist/establishment troll. And not a very good one. TRUMP 2016 ! ! ! ! 4 Reply Share › Vinnie S Cameron Douglas • a month ago Remember the Hillary campaign pays millions to have her internet trolls , protect her failed polices and denounce Trump. 1 Reply Share › Cameron Douglas Vinnie S • a month ago Yes she does! But there is no way to keep up because most citizens with a brain are finally on to her. A million paid trolls would not be enough. I'm saying TRUMP LANDSLIDE 2016 ! ! ! ! 2 Reply Share › Dropofclearwqter Cameron Douglas • 20 days ago I was thinking the same. Clearly a paid troll. • Reply • Share › Dropofclearwqter Lisa Gunther • 20 days ago Troll Alert!!!!!!!!!!! • Reply • Share › Tabby Lisa Gunther • a month ago The article shows what hillary is capable of and willing to do for power, and she is trumps competition. So you're all "never trump" knowing that means yes hillary, yet you call others dumb? You and others like you think trump's words really are more harmful than the evil acts of hillary. Congrats on being a big part of the problem. Fyi: trump has spoken against the Iraq war time and time again. He also has mentioned the corruption that lead to Syria and libya. He told folks in media repeatedly where we were headed for years and he's been right. Before calling him stupid, do some research instead of stumping for hillary. • Reply • Share › womanity constancy Cameron Douglas • a month ago Why would Arabs believe the notorious liar Trumpf wants peace or disfavors war? The brutish carnival barker hates everyone except white people of the 1% class, only white men matter. The Donald flaunts his bankruptcies, corruption and violence from behind the wall of barricaded media and untouchable privilege. How does his rabid anti-Muslim rhetoric please Arab tastes? Actual U.S. peacemakers struggle to be heard, sabotaged by the same warmongers that sponsor Trump and Clintons. Bernie Sanders could help, if anyone can. • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas womanity constancy • a month ago You are ridiculous. You need to first listen to Trump before you spout MainStream Media lies. Get the facts and come back! 1 Reply Share › Cameron Douglas womanity constancy • a month ago You obviously are still listening to MainStream Media monopoly. Get off the poison. Check reality. Even a little research on your part will reveal to you how MSM twists what he says. And why do Arabs believe Trump will bring peace? I don't know except to say my friend is from Iraq...lost his leg there...and he told me that most of them believe that. And, well, they can see what Hillary had brought to the Middle East.... WAR AND KILLING! That could be the reason. Lol 1 • Reply • Share › womanity constancy Cameron Douglas • a month ago MSM *IS* drumpf and h, 24/7 coverage inescapable of both liars with TheDon'T plastered on every screen ceaselessly. It's that LinkTv on constant default setting that brainwashes me relentlessly with old fogies like Chris Hedges, Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Danny Glover, etc., etc., teaching truth, justice, peace and l.o.v.e. instead of commercial consumer panic. Sorry you disagree, but neither msm-sponsored phony candidate is worth further comment. Good luck. Reply Share › Cameron Douglas womanity constancy • a month ago You don't know that. I believe you are wrong about Trump. Time will tell. I think you will be eating your words. And many of the people you listed are very biased to liberal view points. To really get the big picture you have to widen your listening. 1 Reply Share › Caroline Mc Gilloway womanity constancy • 10 days ago You are STUPID, as all Sanders and Clinton supporters are. I accuse all their supporters of being unAmerican , also socialist communist ideology, never in USA. Wake up womanity • Reply • Share › Tabby womanity constancy • a month ago The war mongers hate trump. They are the people so avidly against him. What are you talking about? When did he ever mention any Arabs? He said he wanted to PAUSE MUSLIM IMMIGRATION. That's it. He didn't speak against muslims. He spoke against the increased immigration from muslim countries which is being sped up by the war mongers before September, UNTIL WE CAN FIGURE IT OUT. He said it after isis told the world they have infiltrated the refugees. Stop lying. Stop fear mongering. Stop stumping for hillary by bashing trump. That's what you're doing either intentionally or not; There is no chance of sanders any longer. He sold his supporters out when he endorsed hillary. He made it clear that his position was fluid by supporting her. He is no different. The media is against trump not for him so wtf are you talking about? • Reply • Share › Diana Forsea Juan TwoTree • a month ago It would be a blood bath for Trump. Trump can't even handle a debate. He was banned from some media. Trump shows he knows nothing on world issues, when he talks to reporters. Trump has no experience, no record, no agenda, no platform and bad morals. Bernie's record shows, he works for the people. 1 • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas Diana Forsea • a month ago That's funny. Trump is the only one speaking the truth. Listen to the liars if you want. But in the long run you are going to severely regret it if you get your way. 1 Reply Share › Justin C. Ganesh • 7 months ago "Page Not Found". Was it really taken down? 2 • Reply • Share › Ganesh Justin C. • 7 months ago HAAHAHAHA. What scumbags. 'Freedom of Information Act' my a$$. Fortunately, the WayBackMachine got it. One of the most useful and amazing pages on the Internet. https://web.archive.org/web/20... 14 Reply Share › Bruno Pierre Gebarski Ganesh • 6 months ago Thank you for the "backlink" 1 Reply Share › Qanni Katifa Ganesh • 5 months ago Internet Archive's Wayback Machine https://www.foia.state.gov/sea... Bummer. The machine that serves this file is down. We're working on it. • Reply • Share › Ganesh Qanni Katifa • 5 months ago It's up now: https://web.archive.org/web/20... 2 Reply Share › This comment was deleted. Ganesh Guest • 6 months ago Sounds like a very impartial and serious summary of events to me. Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer Ganesh • 6 months ago full of layman speech and simple banal political outlooks. "qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources", referring to people with their first names without prior mention "jabril, jilal and others are impatient", simply lay adjectives for a philosopher: self-promoter, semi joke figure (Bernard Henri Levy), talking about sweeping rumors (which are false), and doing it with bad grammar: "Qaddafi may be dead, or maybe not". and then just wild speculations about what qaddafi plans to do with his gold, (which isn't itself a danger, as a strong currency first needs to have low inflation, which african countries could not achieve), and then proposed motives for france's intervention, which are only re-iterations of motives that have been thrown all around ever since USA invaded Iraq in 2003. Any guy on the street who has watched the news a bit can tell you the same motives for any military intervention by the western world: oil, influence, internal politics, show of military hardware. 1 Reply Share › Ganesh Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago It's a memo from her close political confidant, directly to her. It's not written for the Congressional record or something. That doesn't mean it isn't serious. 7 Reply Share › Erast Van Doren Ganesh • 4 months ago In any case, 7 bln. not near enough to back any currency. Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer Ganesh • 6 months ago it could be from a crazy conspiracy theorist for all we know, because it has no real insight, just lay interpretations and unoriginal ideas for france's motives which have no touch with reality. • Reply • Share › Ganesh Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago Hey, f*cking idiot, it's by Sidney Blumenthal, a close Hillary Confidant, to Hillary. 16 Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer Ganesh • 6 months ago Angry because I don't buy your crazy talk? How do you know he's a "close confidant"? How do you know she takes this guy seriously at all? I'm sure she doesn't because he's simply crazy, hillary knew the reason for and supported the Nato campaign. You would know too if you weren't watching Bollywood at the time. Even more stupid is you halfbrains presenting this as the reason for the bombing of Libyan army, whereas it's only a delusional guy's blogging, no different than what you guys write here. Reply Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago I'm sure she doesn't because he's simply crazy... The lengths some people will go to in order to deny information that doesn't conform to their predetermined beliefs... 15 Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer Jeremy R. Hammond • 6 months ago i guess you're talking about people denying the obvious, stated, world-wide witnessed reasons for the air campaign in Libya. Because there's no information in this letter. It is simply one man's idea of what France's motives are. Reply Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago It's not just some whacko conspiracy theorist writing, as you seem to have convinced yourself. It's a journalist and long-time close adviser to Hillary Clinton. It's not as though it's that far out that Western powers act out of financial interests when it comes to their foreign policy. Or would you have us believe that they would only wage war on a country with the most benevolent of intentions? 13 Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer Jeremy R. Hammond • 6 months ago they did not wage war on libya. secondly, even with the current situation in libya kerry said something must be done. back then it was 10 times worse. but you're a dumb ignorant sensation seeker so it doesn't matter for you. 1 Reply Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago they did not wage war on libya. Why don't you return here to Earth from the planet you were living on when the US waged war on Libya and get caught up so we can have a discussion. 14 Reply Share › Moan Humpsky Ferit Tuzer • 5 months ago why don't you go take a look at Libya, and see if it got warred? 7 • Reply • Share › selftorture Jeremy R. Hammond • 11 days ago Bush Sr said Iraq was about more than oil. I personably would not believe the person who founded the CIA, who are by far the worlds worst terrorists. • Reply • Share › Ferit Tuzer Jeremy R. Hammond • 6 months ago like denying the scientific fact that vaccines work and are safe? like you do. • Reply • Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago I'd be more than happy to have a discussion of the facts about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, if you'd like to set aside your predetermined beliefs about the subject and take that discussion elsewhere. To stay on topic, I reiterate my point about how your statement "I'm sure [Hillary Clinton] doesn't [take Sydney Blumenthal seriously] because he's simply crazy" illustrates your willful ignorance of information that doesn't conform to your predetermined beliefs. 17 Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer Jeremy R. Hammond • 6 months ago what is information? him saying i think this is why france bombed them? that's not information that's a conspiracy theory that's divorced from facts. Reply Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago You continue to illustrate my point. 11 Reply Share › Sinan Ferit Tüzer Jeremy R. Hammond • 6 months ago "Newly disclosed emails show that Libya’s plan to create a gold-backed currency to compete with the euro and dollar was a motive for NATO’s intervention" you are incapable of understanding written word. this is as crazy man's ramblings about a motive for the air campaign, the letters do not reveal the motive. so if anybody thinks X is the motive for country Y doing something, that "reveals" the motive? what a bunch of idiots you are. oh by the way your whacko web site has blocked me. i guess you idiots like to simmer up craziness among yourselves I should not disturb you. Reply Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Sinan Ferit Tüzer • 6 months ago this is as crazy man's ramblings One could say the same thing about your own comment, and much more credibly so. 12 Reply Share › Tralbry Jeremy R. Hammond • 3 months ago Exactly. Ferit's desperate rambling and denial, was a little amusing at first, but now it's morphed into something just sad. 3 Reply Share › Simon Gunson Ganesh • 25 days ago The link you provided has been blocked • Reply • Share › Ganesh Simon Gunson • 23 days ago archive.org is an amazing tool https://web.archive.org/web/20... also: judicialwatch.org/wp-content/u... also: wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/e... Reply Share › Ali Mahboub Agha Ganesh • a month ago page is gone • Reply • Share › Ganesh Ali Mahboub Agha • 23 days ago https://web.archive.org/web/20... also: judicialwatch.org/wp-content/u... also: wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/e... Reply Share › Kim Ganesh • a month ago Interesting how all this information is now GONE. • Reply • Share › Ganesh Kim • a month ago Yeah, it's pretty F*cked tbh. How you liking this 'most transparent administration' in history? The amazing archive.org has got your back: https://web.archive.org/web/20... Reply Share › Persianized Mongol Ganesh • 5 months ago Lol page not found wow • Reply • Share › Ganesh Persianized Mongol • 5 months ago I posted an archive link elsewhere in this thread. If you can't find it, just copy and paste that URL into archive.org 1 Reply Share › rollingearthsong Ganesh • 6 months ago the documents/info have been removed.. • Reply • Share › Ganesh rollingearthsong • 6 months ago https://web.archive.org/web/20... 2 Reply Share › Ben S Ganesh • 6 months ago The link is broken now,. what happened? • Reply • Share › Ganesh Ben S • 6 months ago https://web.archive.org/web/20... is it 2 Reply Share › лидия ramoncramon • 7 months ago It is true and Hillary is a "credible" candidate to USA prez from Dems. Enjoy. On the other hand, as if Obama is not as guilty as her. Just as W Bush is guilty of Iraq criminal aggressive war. Obama did nothing to bring Bush and his cohort to justice, because justice is not for USA prezes or State secs. Kissinger is a "honorable" man too. 14 • Reply • Share › Post American лидия • 5 months ago I believe that new Presidents get sat down by surviving ex-Presidents and get the facts of life explained to them. All Presidents break the law, at least technically, at one time or another, or defend their behavior in ways that not all would accept. If one Administration prosecutes the preceding President, ALL Presidents will face criminal charges upon leaving office. It will be the end of politics as we know it, and future candidates for the office will be even lower on the food chain than the current mob. I would love to see Bush, Cheney, Powell, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith and others behind bars, but I recognize that it is a political impossibility. 1 Reply Share › лидия Post American • 5 months ago " It will be the end of politics as we know it" Exactly - so this "politics" is just a chain of criminal rulers, so, sure, it should keep on, right? 6 Reply Share › Keith Kapko Post American • 5 months ago And not Hillary? The most reprehensible person ever to seek the presidency. She should have been first on that list. 1 • Reply • Share › corners Keith Kapko • 4 months ago "The most reprehensible person ever to seek the presidency. She should have been first on that list" Even though she was only a vp pick, id say sarah palin was the scariest person to ever get close to the white house, followed by clintons/bushs dynastys Reply Share › Francisco Machado лидия • 7 months ago The Iraq war was a response to Iraq invading Kuwait. The Iraqi forces were driven out of Kuwait and away from the border with destruction of much of their materiel to insure that they would not re-commence the invasion. This part of the U.S. aggression had a specifically target valid purpose, was well executed, succeeded, and stopped once the goal had been achieved. A detente was reached and hostilities suspended based upon agreements with the government of Iraq. Those agreements were violated, there was credible intelligence of the sequestration of weapons, this intelligence believed by all Western powers (and Democrats, Hillary included). The removal of Saddam, perhaps justified, was predictably a mistake since there was no sufficiently powerful stable replacement any better than Saddam to fill the vacuum and the U.S. withdrew, abandoning military gains and letting the whole disaster go to hell - like much of the rest of the Middle east. We also removed, by this action, a counterforce to Iran. They had kept one another entertained, so to speak. After trying to create a similar disaster in Egypt with only temporary success, we did it again in Libya and we're certainly not exactly guilt free in Syrian events. It is difficult not to see the results of the actions of Obama and the State Department as anything but calculated to sow mayhem throughout North Africa and the Middle East. 2 • Reply • Share › лидия Francisco Machado • 7 months ago Sure, USA could NEVER commit a crime, maximum a "justified mistake" USA had never invaded any state and always (!) punish invaders. USA rulers never lie, so when they told that Saddam had WMD they sure believed in it, and never mind other people who had known better and had told so BEFORE USA aggression. And if USA imperialism is supported by Europe imperialism it is somehow made it better. And sure, Hitler had NOT did something bad in purpose, otherwise he would be victorious, but as his deeds turned sour to him it means he had not planned what he did. It could be funny to read FM were it not about the millions of murdered by USA imperialism's crimes and even more hurt, robbed, uprooted and so on. A piece of news for FM - the majority of the world population do NOT see USA /Europe imperialism as benign but somehow stumbling - they see it as criminal and aimed to their destruction. And this view is based on hundreds years of bitter experience. 10 Reply Share › Cayman Liu лидия • 7 months ago Everyone in the world knows what Americans have been always doing. People just don't say it out loud. 5 Reply Share › лидия Cayman Liu • 7 months ago and when people do say it, capitalist media from which FM clearly took his position of just do not post it, so FM is still unaware of it. 6 Reply Share › лидия лидия • 7 months ago My web "admirer" is very fond of polls. His (?) favorite piece is a poll of Libyans supporting of their own country bombed by NATO - which, of course, means that NATO was right to bomb Libya - he still claims it. And my web "admirer" is still could not get that I am NOT "replying" to him, I just comment his imperialist propaganda. 3 Reply Share › лидия лидия • 7 months ago Yeah, polls. Like a new one in which Saudi citizens (70%) was happy with their state freedoms. 2 Reply Share › лидия лидия • 7 months ago T my web "admirer" still could not get that I am NOT "replying" to him(!) - I do not usually reply or talk to Zionist-imperialist parrots. I simply comment on their propaganda to let others know what their lies are. Funny how T still tries LOL 2 Reply Share › лидия лидия • 7 months ago T stalks me all over the net, trying in wain to get my repay to his(?) parroting of imperialist/Zionist propaganda and also calling me names. It sure shows that he is not at all interested in me taking him seriously enough to answer. LOL 4 Reply Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago And youve quite clearly shown how ive gotten to you with your feeble attempts to portray it as otherwise. If one didnt care one wouldnt say anything, but we see this isnt the case with you. Getting to you isnt a goal though, or someone to be proud. But it has been shown nonetheless. > LOL Like a teenager. Reply Share › лидия лидия • 7 months ago T sure has a mania granidousa if he(?) imagines that I have never met such Zionist/imperialist parrots. As a matter of fact, I have refutations ready to their propaganda exactly because of a long experience. But I must admit, this one is really something - he is stalking me all over the web, even on Russian websites. Not that it makes any difference to me - I see all of his ilk as the same and very predictable. 2 • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 6 months ago Also commenting directly to my comment but replying to yourself on wsws, what an imbecile you are. It must tear you up that most people on this planet see the soviet union as a pathetic failure. Reply Share › Mitch лидия • 6 months ago > I have refutations ready to their propaganda Youre very shy about showing them. So far far we havent seen anything but bold claims. • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago >I have refutations ready to their propaganda exactly because of a long experience. People reading these threads will no doubt wonder why you are so shy about showing these refutations.... > I see all of his ilk as the same and very predictable. Except for the fact that you clearly dont know "my ilk", as shown by you calling me an imperialist and Zionist. Now shoo along lidia. • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago Aw shucks, youre breaking my heart lidia. But youve kind of ruined this "not replying thing", by basically "replying" to yourself when i am not around because you know you cant go toe to toe with me. Your arguments are just too weak for you arent a very bright person. Because of this you try to get in a last say hoping that some people will see this as a sign of victory, unfortunately for you most people arent as stupid as you are. They see that your arguments are without merit and that your afraid to reply directly to me. Now, move along with your tail between your legs lid, thats a good individual. • Reply • Share › Miriam лидия • 4 months ago And you *really* think those polls hold no water whatsoever? The Saudi's are not only backward culturally but their government is PAYING them to keep quiet, not only in Saudi, but abroad as well. For the small price of their freedom, they not only have everything provided to them in Saudi Arabia, but also if they so choose to escape the rules, ANYWHERE in the West, especially England and the United States, where young Saudi's go to study, with a stipend given to them by the government in which the amount they receive per month is more than a minimum wage worker would see in 4 months. They are rich Wahhabis, so yes, while the polls may have some error due to fear of being discovered, if they are mostly anonymous, you can guarantee those fuckers are telling the truth. Go ahead and talk to any Saudi abroad, and they will defend their hellhole to the death. This is not a coincidence, and you hardly see it among other nations in the world when it's citizens migrate somewhere more prosperous. • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago Hi lidia, You accidentally replied to yourself instead of me. What poll is this. Also your argument relies on the tactics that a teenager would use, this is wrong, therefore this other thing is wrong too. You claim to have been alive during the time of the soviet union so you obviously cant be a teenager, instead you must just be quite dim. Now please exit this thread in an orderly fashion. • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago >My web "admirer" is very fond of polls. Fond of evidence, as opposed to you. >His (?) favorite piece is a poll of Libyans supporting of their own country bombed by NATO - which, of course, means that NATO was right to bomb Libya - he still claims it. So, the evidence shows what the evidence shows, if you have evidence that libyans would have been happier to have gaddafi bombing them then please present it. >And my web "admirer" is still could not get that I am NOT "replying" to him, I just comment his imperialist propaganda. Its because you know you cant win a factual argument, so you have to talk around them. • Reply • Share › SuperTech86 Cayman Liu • 3 months ago Everyone in the world except most American's because most of the countries derives almost 100% of their information on U.S foreign policy from mainstream media outlets. Which means in reality they know next to nothing about everything. • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago >A piece of news for FM - the majority of the world population do NOT see USA /Europe imperialism as benign but somehow stumbling - they see it as criminal and aimed to their destruction. Heres some polling evidence on the us: http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/... Here is russias in comparison: http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/... :/ Quick lidia, form a counter response and quickly reply it to yourself! 1 • Reply • Share › corners лидия • 4 months ago you need to learn to read better. Francisco wasnt saying usa is awesome. He was saying we got our fingers in places we shouldnt, and made thigns messier than theyw ere. • Reply • Share › Francisco Machado лидия • 7 months ago Thanks for the unexpected support! I wish I could disagree about the decline of U.S. world prestige, particularly in the Middle east where it could have had constructive effects. The Progressives have certainly mucked things up, and George Bush - while without the dedicated destructive fanaticism of Obama - was certainly and unmistakably a Progressive. Names are sometimes far from descriptive of what is named - perhaps a better name for that political philosophy should be "the Destructives." While you and I may favorably view the diminishing probability of the continuation of these policies in a Hillary C. presidency, it's hard to visualize the difficulties confronting the next President reversing the last dozen years of problems. • Reply • Share › лидия Francisco Machado • 7 months ago FM could not read? I am speaking about the mass-murder and other crimes and FM worries about "decline of U.S. world prestige". Of course, I am NOT "favorably view the diminishing probability of the continuation of these policies in a Hillary C. presidency". Killary committed enough crimes serving USA imperialism already and sure would continue and commit even more if made a USA prez by USA ruling class, as usual. Of course, I have no illusions about possible alternative ie Sanders. But where I write "crimes" FM read "problems" - nice word and no one is to blame, esp USA imperialist rulers. 3 Reply Share › Mirek Francisco Machado • 7 months ago Before the invasion of Kuwait, Saddam Hussein was cojoled by the US Ambassador into thinking that Washington would treat that incursion at arms length. What ensued was just the opposite, the whole media propaganda machine was set into motion, including the `humidicrib story and babies being thrown to the floor`, a total fabrication, but given the full treatment by the prestitute media. This gave the opening to US imperialism for the whole string of wars of aggression in the Middle East. Much as 9/11 used for the world-wide `war on terror`, a PR stroke of genius`! 5 • Reply • Share › william beeby Mirek • 6 months ago I believe you are right in what you say. Reply Share › Ronda Mirek • 7 months ago So I'm guessing you've already seen this? https://www.youtube.com/result... • Reply • Share › Mitch Mirek • 7 months ago >Saddam Hussein was cojoled by the US Ambassador into thinking that Washington would treat that incursion at arms length. Tariq aziz himself pointed out that this wasnt true. • Reply • Share › Francisco Machado Mirek • 7 months ago Why would the notoriously liberal media support any action initiated by George Bush? Indeed, why did Hillary support the WMG intelligence in a speech, saying she was certain of their existence? • Reply • Share › лидия Francisco Machado • 7 months ago "the notoriously liberal media" is a misname. The proper name is "the wholly imperialist media". USA imperialism is bipartisan, and both imperialist parties are turning the world into hell. Who was a prez - Dem or Rep in every case of imperialist crime is not important at all. 5 Reply Share › lolana Francisco Machado • 4 months ago NPR reported the yellow cake memo was fake, then stood by and commentators said absolutely nothing about it following GWBush's State of the Union where he used that memo as evidence to go to war with Iraq. I kept waiting for them to say, wait what. Never happened. Not in the "analysis" afterwards, or any other time. Liberal media, my ass. • Reply • Share › william beeby Francisco Machado • 6 months ago According to US general Wesley clark ( see youtube videos ) America had/has plans , in his words , to take down 7 Middle Eastern countries . They are well on the way . Saudi Arabia , probably the most brutal , medieval and illegitimate regime on the planet , was not on the list. 2 • Reply • Share › womanity constancy Francisco Machado • 7 months ago Beginning with at least Iraq, there was not credible intelligence for U.S. intervention. Bush-Cheney edited the CIA statement, cutting the denial by Oak Ridge nuclear analysts that the "tubes" had WMD capability. The report was quickly and entirely suppressed, though the news did come out enough to activate millions of protesters. 2 • Reply • Share › Francisco Machado womanity constancy • 7 months ago Decisions, even our own personal ones, are based not upon truth but upon what we believe. If you awaken at an early hour of the morning with the certainty you've left the stove on, you get up and go downstairs to the kitchen. I have telephoned an old friend whom I mistakenly believed to be alive. The world powers acted upon the best and most reliable information they had. Even if conflicting information existed, and even if your husband said "go back to sleep. You wouldn't have left the stove on" you will still probably go to check it. A police officer recently shot someone who, when confronted, drew an extremely realistic pistol. He was not indicted because, under the circumstances and given what information he did have, he made a reasonable decision. Just as an illustration - there are "facts" about the Iraq WMDs, including the finding of the manufacturing facility and more recent discoveries of secreted weapons, but that is "received truth" and may all be lies. Remember: The Democrat Senate voted in Obamacare - based upon "truths" that Gruber later revealed to be lies. We are now suffering from the results. Reply Share › womanity constancy Francisco Machado • 7 months ago Illogical and irrelevant: Fact is, the truth with absolutely the most accurately informed data on Earth was officially provided and deliberately buried. "Yes, honey, I checked the stove and it was NOT on fire." Neocons and their anti-altruistic greed and violence are doomed, so please forget that nightmare dogma. As for the requisite swipe at Obamacare, universal, single-payer healthcare is the most proven system to deal with evolving medical concerns. Cheers. 2 Reply Share › лидия womanity constancy • 7 months ago You are right about single-payer healthcare, but Obama care is NOT such, not even near. And not only neocons are to blame for USA imperialism - Obama and Killary are not less guilty, for ex. Of course, FM trying to whitewash aggression against Iraq is pathetic, but no one could do it better, because he tries to defend the indefensible 4 Reply Share › womanity constancy лидия • a month ago Agreed. No relief in sight (without a Bernie Sanders miracle revolution) for the criminally corrupt healthcare industrialists that kill, cripple and bankrupt more citizens than other developed nations have in decades. Tragic and part of the grander MIC. Clintonian warmongering may be greater than Obama's, but the old Establishment remains a neoliberal conservative gang unaffectionately dubbed neocon for the rare blend of oblivious arrogance. That Ayn Rand voodoo economics keeps people too poor and uninformed to respond. Excuse me for going off point, disappointed in the #BernieBlackout setback that darkens prospects for change. Reply Share › Keith Kapko womanity constancy • 5 months ago You are clearly delusional in regards to Obamacare. When half of obamacare co-ops have closed their doors, its not exactly a sign of its success. Cheers • Reply • Share › Francisco Machado womanity constancy • 7 months ago But you "checked it and it was not on fire." You checked it. Why? to determine that it was not on fire. Saddam would not let the inspectors in to check that he was not violating the terms of the ceasefire. Even Hillary Clinton believed Saddam had WMDs. Spoken publicly in a broadcast speech. Reported in mass media. Or was that just another lie motivated by her "anti-altruistic greed and violence?" • Reply • Share › womanity13 Francisco Machado • 6 months ago Of course it was a lie, a monstrous fraud. Weapons inspectors found zero evidence of nukes in Iraq. The Bush-Cheney Crusaders kicked out the authoritative expert Hans Blix immediately before murdering the populace with a heinous bombardment reminiscent of Dresden. Did you read the definitive statement (deleted by cherry-picking goons) in which the world's primary sources on nuclear research declared the so-called tubes were incapable of such armament? The 9/11 Commission had it. Well, at least pretend to care about factual reality and look it up for yourself. That google thingy miraculously finds all sorts of data, if a search contains more than half-wit nonsense. I had a Q clearance for a massive nuclear project and have no patience for disinformation and warmonger hysteria. You do not want to know the truth, so far be it from me to indulge your delusions. Good luck. 2 Reply Share › Keith Kapko womanity13 • 5 months ago You, being in supporter of the left and its failed administration clearly outlines your propensity to embellish information. Its a prerequisite for being a party member of the left. Their fraudulent elections are one way they win political positions. Support from a completely gullible and dillusional public, spoon fed the feces regurgitated from a gaping hole in the front of their heads, is the other. Hillary is a perfect example of the first way and you fall in to the second. Good Luck Reply Share › lolana Keith Kapko • 4 months ago But the Right doesn't do fraudulent elections....uh huh Reply Share › lolana Francisco Machado • 4 months ago Second Iraq war came after we decimated their country with sanctions and bombed the shit out of them in the 90's. Second Iraq war came after Saddam begged US not to strike, agreed to every single demand, plus agreed to buy one million US-made automobiles for the next ten years. Too bad, though, US wanted to bomb, maim, and kill, its own, and theirs too, in their cowboy wars. But hey, Madeline Albright said the sanctions that killed that half a million kids in the 90's..they were Worth It. Yep..that's what she said. And here we are. 1 • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas Francisco Machado • 3 months ago And don't forget that Saddam Hussein was extremely anti-terrorist. Iraq was a huge source of anti-terrorist intelligence. Saddam had plenty of faults, but he was a huge asset to the US....until it didn't suit their plans. • Reply • Share › SuperTech86 Francisco Machado • 3 months ago "It is difficult not to see the results of the actions of Obama and the State Department as anything but calculated to sow mayhem throughout North Africa and the Middle East." Except for the fact that the neocons and the CIA had been running ops in those same countries for DECADES before Obama got into office waiting and planning to accomplish exactly what was done. You clearly have no idea what the Zionists/neocons/CIA/DOD/MIC has been up to over the past half century. • Reply • Share › Francisco Machado SuperTech86 • 3 months ago The Unites States has been involved in wars and political intrigues in North Africa since the very beginning of the nineteenth century. It is, however, the actions of the Obama administration to which I refer. The roots of the current situation date back largely to the post WW I period. My reference is to the current situation and the abysmal blunders and miscalculations if from stupidity or treasonable acts against international law if deliberate, made by the current administration. the history of American involvement is not irrelevant to the situation, but is largely irrelevant to the current administration's disastrous handling of it. More specifically, what has every appearance of a deliberate attempt to engender a state of anarchy in nearly all of North Africa and the Middle East by deposing or unseating controlling elements which, bad though they were, engendered a level of mayhem far below what their removal has created. Yes, Bush bears some responsibility, but the need is to correct the current situation. Iraq was in a (relatively) stable situation until Obama withdrew troops before there was a sufficiently well organized controlling power to maintain order. Our government is also providing financial backing and arms to terrorist groups, by second hand transfer if not directly. We are a major contributor to the actions that are driving millions out of the involved countries, an action that provides cover for terrorists moving into European countries and the United States. Note that the CIA is not now under control of any of the prior administrations. It is under control of the Obama administration. Holding a gun to the head of Bill Clinton or George Bush and demanding they alter the activities of the CIA would get you nowhere - but jail. Deal with now, not a decade ago. Reply Share › Paul Buckley Francisco Machado • 7 months ago Good summary of this issue. As for Hillary Jane Fonda Clinton I see the lying woman as directly culpable for the death of our people at Benghazi and the campaign of lies that followed. Her and her blood buddy Blumenthal are disgusting criminals. • Reply • Share › Mitch лидия • 7 months ago What do you think of isis making gains in areas in which russia bombed? Thumbnail Bit odd, no? 1 • Reply • Share › corners Mitch • 4 months ago the maps not really giving us much for context. Whats it take to lose or gain control of those dots? How long do they have to hold it for it to turn? Where are other collation air strikes? At least be fair. 1 Reply Share › Rome Cruci ramoncramon • 7 months ago "IF"...hehehe 4 • Reply • Share › dagoof ramoncramon • 4 months ago We all should hang for allowing our governments to get away with this garbage. 2 • Reply • Share › lolana ramoncramon • 4 months ago It didn't begin with Hillary and won't end there. This kind of crap goes back decades and no one ever answers for it....for very long.. 1 • Reply • Share › ramoncramon lolana • 4 months ago Patreus answered for it as well as the guys who outed Valarie Plame Reply Share › AndrewM. ramoncramon • 5 months ago Then Trump. 1 • Reply • Share › NUTTY ramoncramon • 7 months ago What do you mean "IF"? 1 • Reply • Share › margsview ramoncramon • 7 months ago Even with sourced citing, you still qualify and question, unbelievable... 1 • Reply • Share › greyghost1 ramoncramon • 14 days ago The reason for the war is true the email evidence is whats new. • Reply • Share › ImaHippyBurning ramoncramon • a month ago Even if it's NOT True! • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas ramoncramon • 3 months ago It's all true. • Reply • Share › Houmpheng Phonsavath ramoncramon • 6 months ago Obombma too. • Reply • Share › BenjaminGhazi • 7 months ago The amazing part of all of this is 'how many times can she commit acts of treason' against the United States of America before Comey/Lynch INDICT HER! 22 • Reply • Share › Chris Mitchell BenjaminGhazi • 7 months ago You are absolutely right, but I hope you don't support the other criminals (ie. Republicans). All of them, both parties are treasonous. 4 Reply Share › lolana Chris Mitchell • 4 months ago Of course he supports the others. Reply Share › Hai Vuong BenjaminGhazi • 7 months ago okay, I see there are more likes than signed by the people. It's 15,857 signed of 25,000 now. https://www.change.org/p/trey-... Please click on the page and sign. 1 • Reply • Share › TrueEyes • 7 months ago This is all very true. I knew all these things as they were happening back in 2011. The information was all over the Net back then. Videos of Libyans and migrant workers being executed! The war crimes were horrific! To think that this war criminal, aka Hitlary Clinton, is running for POTUS makes me physically ill! 21 • Reply • Share › Andrew_Nichols TrueEyes • 7 months ago Utterly evil terrifying demagogue and the DNC will go to any lengths to enthrone her. HRC POTUS - WW3 imminent. Trump is less scary! 2 Reply Share › lolana TrueEyes • 4 months ago "We came, we saw, he died" • Reply • Share › Ian Crause • 7 months ago I'd love to know if those emails touch on the Honduras coup..... she covered up all sorts of shit there, as well. It may well be a US National Security issue, of course.... assuming Chiquita Bananas is a national security concern. 16 • Reply • Share › Chris Stone Ian Crause • 7 months ago Well it might well be considering the longstanding historical legacy of The United Fruit company which was essentially a front or body used by the CIA which controlled and influenced various governments in Latin America through it. 6 Reply Share › Benton Marder Ian Crause • 7 months ago Go back further and see if Hillary put Bubba up to expanding NATO eastward after the fall of the Soviet Reich---despite a formal commitment by GHW Bush not to do so. Bubba himself was then making noises about turning the Black Sea into a NATO lake by getting the Ukraine to force Russia out of the Crimea. Obama later gets into the act, along with Lugar, by conning the Ukraine into getting rid of much of its conventional weaponry by promises they had no authority to make. Charming troublemaking bastards. 2 • Reply • Share › Lalibela Nile • 7 months ago Nothing nuh new under Babylon's sun... Relative to foriegn policy, this is business as usual for the West... 12 • Reply • Share › William Sanders • 7 months ago "We came, we saw, he died, hahahahaha." ~ Hilary Clinton laughing about and gloating over the death of Gaddafi on national TV. The woman is an immoral pig and unfit for any kind of public office ... period. Obama and Hilary's foreign policy has turned Libya into an unstable wonderland for Jihadists, causing untold deaths and misery ... This is yet another in your face example of why we should have never interfered in this region of the Middle East. Hilary doesn't possess the wisdom to be Commander n Chief. 11 • Reply • Share › Areminder William Sanders • 7 months ago You are a master of understatement. 4 Reply Share › lolana William Sanders • 4 months ago Yes, I was just thinking about that video, it's a perfect little illustration of how sick the whole game is. • Reply • Share › david • 7 months ago she had Amb . Stevens Murdered , and pulled the Muslim angering video card from her sleeve for the media morons to latch onto . 10 • Reply • Share › Moots • 7 months ago So the $64 question... Where did the GOLD & SILVER GO? The Clinton foundation maybe? 9 • Reply • Share › gerry d welder Moots • 7 months ago IMF gold hoard was reported a few years ago 3rd largest of all countries behind USA and Germany. It is suspected that the USA doesn't have what they report and refuse any audit, Germany can't get it's own gold back (because it too is gone?). So where did all that gold stolen from all those 'regime change' countries go? Hmmmmm Most IMF/UN employees pay NO TAX but Leguard keeps crying about raising your taxes. Wiki the UN, the IMF and World Bank are UN agencies of countless agencies, commissions, 'peace keeping' forces (really?), and organizations that your taxes are paying for. The UN produces nothing and generates no revenues, the UN is a gigantic parasite Trojan horse globalist's world regulatory tool destroying the sovereignty of countries and freedom of citizens. People need to demand dissolution of the UN, kick them the hell out of our country and restitution of it's assets starting with the IMF gold hoard. and the UN's hundreds of thousands of 'world ' pensions. Reply Share › mike • 7 months ago Hillary - "We came, we saw, he died." What an evil witch. 9 • Reply • Share › David in MA mike • 7 months ago Gadhafi knew to much and was getting ready to move on his own, solution: kill the bugger. 1 Reply Share › This comment was deleted. Areminder Guest • 7 months ago Does anyone else remember When the USA was truly an honorable nation and force for the good of humanity throughout the world? Of course that's when we sent more Missionaries than troops in to change lives. Reply Share › Howard Miller Areminder • 7 months ago Being a Canadian I have not been brainwashed to the same degree that US citizens have been in history lessons. US foreign policy has always been atrocious,citing spreading democracy to the unwashed masses as a cover,while supporting unpopular regimes to further US business interests in said areas. Look at the Banana Republics in the 1900's where they put the Sandanistas in power,and the El Salvadorians revolted and deposed them within 6 months. They supported the Shah of Iran,another dictator who tortured and murdered at his whim,who was deposed by the populous and ended in created the muslim state it is today which is now a firm enemy of the US and all things "Western". If you want to cite WW1 or WW2, please remember the isolationist policies that the US politicians pursued,saying it was not in the US's best interests to join with us in the effort. By mid 1917,we had already been soaking the battlefields in our blood for three years. The Germans called Canadians "stormtroopers" because of our tenacity,courage and determination. By 1942,again we had been sacrificing our men for 3 years before the US threw in with us. Your government supported Idi Amin for Us mining interests. Noriega in Panama. I could go on and on. I don't belittle the contribution or sacrifice of your fighting men,some of whom joined the fight well in advance of your government's whims,but I tire of hearing the US calling themselves the world's police force. George Bush Sr. was a statesman who forged an alliance of UN forces including 6 Arab nations to battle Hussien's naked aggression in Kuwait.It was still not altruistic as Saddam threatened the world's oil supply and economic stability. George Bush Jr. though destabilized Afghanistan,then Iraq,and even going as far as threatening to do the same as in Iran,leading to the current situation in the world. To boot he insulted Canada's honour by calling us poor allies when we didn't join in his folly before the UN asked us to intervene. Hell,any idiot could see he was just doing it because of his failure to relight the US economy heading into the next election.He knew no incumbent President on a war footing ever lost an election. Clinton tried a bombing campaign just to distract the media from his affairs.I dare you to name a single conflict involving the US that didn't first involve US corporate interests. see more 6 Reply Share › ardave Howard Miller • 7 months ago Good comment...btw, I love your clocks. (smile) 1 Reply Share › lolana Howard Miller • 4 months ago Word. • Reply • Share › DvBmr Howard Miller • 7 months ago The US IS a Corporation, • Reply • Share › Howard Miller DvBmr • 7 months ago It is patently obvious to me that both our countries are being led by the nose because of the electorial processes and lobbyists that the corporations dominate. Maybe it is time we took the processes back out of their hands by limiting the amount of money they donate to elections and prevent the swag the politicians can accept. It might also help to reduce their salaries so that more people who looking to improve the country instead lining their bank accounts step up. You know, by the people,for the people. 1 Reply Share › knowledgeisgood • 7 months ago Damn these crooked Politicians. 6 • Reply • Share › rbdthnfngfnh • 7 months ago Interesting. Thank you. 6 • Reply • Share › This comment was deleted. Areminder Guest • 7 months ago Good way to get the white house constantly contacting you. I stay away from anything they put up, as much as possible. 1 Reply Share › Ron • 7 months ago The sh*t just keeps getting deeper! I wonder what happened to that 143 tons of gold???????? Our State Dept contains nothing but criminals! And, the biggest one of all is running for President! HRC! 5 • Reply • Share › TEA • 7 months ago The Apostle Paul wrote about this situation in his time. (64-68AD.) It's wickedness in high places, powerful evil spirit entities control nations, politics and religion! Eph. 6;12 In the book of Revelation 9;16 we see 4 evil Angelic beings, unrestrained to slay 2.3 billion in a future war in middle east. In modern times only do we have this destructive power. We need leaders who understand the signs of the times? Not ones who are in league? This presidential election is critical for America's future. 4 • Reply • Share › Karee Bearance TEA • 7 months ago Thank God we know who will win in the end, thank God I know where I am spending eternity! Praise The Lord Jesus Christ!! Amen! 2 Reply Share › Francisco Machado TEA • 7 months ago The Biblical writers understood the nature of man. They extrapolated the history of their time into the future, predicting that we would do the same things - over and over and over. And we do. 1 • Reply • Share › JPierre33 TEA • 7 months ago ...and a whole bunch of western 'evangelists' are anxious for this development towards their perceived rapture...all"... waiting for the miracle to come'. • Reply • Share › Areminder JPierre33 • 7 months ago One way or other, IT WILL COME. It's just that Jesus said it's Not for US to Know the Times and Seasons, but God ONLY. He told us to "occupy til I come." and that word means "work" so we're NOT TO GO OFF AND JUST WAIT, BUT WORK TO HELP ALL THOSE AROUND US FIND HIM AND AN ETERNITY IN HEAVEN AND NOT HADES. Reply Share › craig klucas • 7 months ago What happened to Gaddafi's gold? 4 • Reply • Share › Lantus • 7 months ago God Help Us, if this woman is elected President and OBAMA is installed as Secretary General of the UN. 3 • Reply • Share › Areminder Lantus • 7 months ago HE will be the ONLY true help for us, (Even as HE ALREADY IS!) Reply Share › mike • 7 months ago Criminal to the degree of Nazism. They should all hang at the end of a rope for crimes against humanity! 3 • Reply • Share › Buck • 7 months ago I did not like kadaffie . But I remember that he had given up his weapons of mass destruction and they said he was helping in the war against al kadia . I think he was afraid we were gonna come after him. Which of course we did. I look at the chaos created since he was killed. Same with the other Arab nations. The tyrants are bad and they rule with an iron hand. But the Muslim terror groups seem to be much worse. We got all these country's government over thrown and we see today what is happening. Bad stuff. 3 • Reply • Share › William Sanders Buck • 7 months ago Actually, the Libyan economy was great under Gaddafi. The people all got a cut from the country's oil revenues, were paid the highest wages in the Middle East with almost non-existent unemployment, while enjoying a comfortable life style far above that of any other country in the region. Gaddafi may have been a strange bird, but he was good to his people. 8 Reply Share › Francisco Machado Buck • 7 months ago Observing the Middle East culture, was it possible to maintain stability in these countries in any other way but to rule with an iron hand? Qaddafi, it appeared, had learned by his past mistakes. Unfortunately for him and for Libya, he stabilized the country and became an economic threat to the Western powers, which they find less acceptable than terrorism. 1 • Reply • Share › Buck Francisco Machado • 7 months ago These Muslim I think do indeed need an iron hand as the only thing they respect is brute force. The leaders of these country's killed the enemy's so they didn't have to worry about them later. A shame but seems to be the way it is. Reply Share › Areminder Buck • 7 months ago khadaffie came to NYC to speak to the UN and clinton global initiative his last year of his life. bill and hill helped him get the permits to set up his royal tent in the middle of one of the parks. Then someone leaked the fact that he was to be "served" by a large number of female sex slaves and embarrassed them to the point the tent permit was pulled and he had to move to some prominant building. I always figured her effort to get rid of (kill) him was for embarrassing them with the city. • Reply • Share › Buck Areminder • 7 months ago I remember when he went to New York . Think he spoke at the UN. No doubt about it he was a bad man. Reply Share › Jack • 7 months ago So, once again, H. Clinton puts her stamp of approval on a process to eliminate Gaddafi, something she could spin and deny later to the unwashed US sheep, to help foreign interests opposed to the real interests of US citizens. But they do give her donations to her foundation, probably. Normally, assassinating Gaddafi would be cheered by most people in the US but we know she wasn't bright enough nor brave enough to come up with this idea on her own. Her international handlers, though, do seem to have her dialed in. No wonder she doesn't bother to try and cover her tracks well enough, the opposition is guiding her and she knows it. 2 • Reply • Share › Jeff Z • 7 months ago Iraq was the same thing - Saddam was planning an 'oil bank' payable in gold or Euros to circumvent the petro-dollar. Its seems the regime who claims to do all in the name of good is the actual criminals throughout history. 2 • Reply • Share › Areminder Jeff Z • 7 months ago Only recent history, once upon a time we honestly did. 1 Reply Share › Arron Frazier • 7 months ago You people on hear talk about throwing Hilary Obama and other politicians. If you don't throw in the jail the people who give them their marching orders it will not matter. News flash the America people aren't giving those marching orders. The bankers corporations and businesses people are giving the orders. 2 • Reply • Share › Simon Gunson • 25 days ago Clearly the real reason for using a private email server was to ensure plausible deniability of illegal interventions in other countries. BTW what has become of that server and why has it not been confiscated yet? 1 • Reply • Share › Teflon KC • 2 months ago The Western powers literally depend on Africa being broken and disadvantaged. So f****** cruel and evil, Hillary needs to be rotting behind bars 1 • Reply • Share › Vishwas Patil • 4 months ago No wonder Saudis are puppets of US to save their own skin. But for Russia, Bashir would have met with same fate as Gaddafi. 1 • Reply • Share › GeorgeG • 7 months ago She's a traitor and criminal and should be behind bars.. she is sociopathic by clinical definition, cowardly and a nasty piece of work....the fact she is a front runner for Dems candidacy shows you how far America has fallen and the principles of the constitution shamefully lost....she climbs and manouuvers and plots in an America where the rule of law is non-existent, and applied with extreme prejudice between the scum elites and the others... she makes her way in a system where the breadth and depth of corruption has crossed the Rubicon....case in point - a financial system that's too connected and to big to jail. Put simply, the whole system is fcked and absolutely destined for a 2nd American Revolution. 1 • Reply • Share › battle • 7 months ago This is old news. Most of the countries we invade in the middle east is because of them not using the petro dollar to sell oil, not terrorism. 1 • Reply • Share › Benton Marder • 7 months ago The gods are dealing with this---by visiting upon Europe and the USA their divine punishment. This is the meaning of the Muslim Invasion and Conquest of Europe and the Wetback Reconquista and the Muslim Invasion of the USA---brought about by the Hubris and Ate of the very people that destroyed Libya. Lady Nemesis usually has the last word. In motre secular terms, 'Blowback is a b---h.' 1 • Reply • Share › CCblogging • 7 months ago Hillary is a criminal traitor and Bill is a criminal rapist. What a couple! 1 • Reply • Share › bonni✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ • 7 months ago And after all this not only is Hillary allowed to run for office.. her security rating has never been stripped from her?????? What the h3!! does it take for a Dem to get convicted of ANYTHING ???? 1 • Reply • Share › Areminder bonni✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ • 7 months ago When the demons turn hades into an ice rink, there may be a good chance of that happening on a large scale. Remember she's the daughter of a Major Cog in the Chicago Crime Political Machine. (And sister in more current times.) Reply Share › Tony • 7 months ago An nothing will happen let alone be mentioned by the media,she will still run for president with plenty of support that puts in question her supporters morals an suggest they actually support these murders an wars.So it's true big business an criminal politicians are to blame we must also share this blame on the people that consistently vote an support these same politicians after the truth in there actions repeatedly come out time an again.Why are the people in power an there big business masters not being prosecuted for God's sake there murdering millions of people,man woman children without a care.There destroying countries an getting away with it, there psychotic mass murderers.Hitler was a saint conspired to these people.And were did that gold an silver go no mention of it.. 1 • Reply • Share › Chris Stone • 7 months ago Am I missing something about this statement here from the article above. 'Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency.' The euro banknotes and coins were introduced in France on 1 January 2002, after a transitional period of three years when the euro was the official currency but only existed as 'book money'. So how is this statement from the article above correct or true? 1 • Reply • Share › Jester1137 Chris Stone • 7 months ago Start Here - Sorry, wouldn't let me link. Please search for " CFA Franc". It's a currency backed by the French treasury theoretically exchangeable for Euros at a fixed rate of 100=1. 3 Reply Share › name • a day ago No worries mate. Here can you buy "Cialis or Viagra, Levitra" name at a decent price! Please check out that site I recommended...( http://lialilarabdi.blogspot.c... ). Use this promo code discount ( rw-5378 ). Hope that helps. Thumbnail • Reply • Share › phreeman • 17 days ago ....the New World Order corruption destroys completely...and the NWO's infiltration of the US Federal Government is alarming - no wonder Obama never filled the Inspector General Positions at myriad Departments and Agencies, and targeted good American "Whistle Blowers"....and instructed an Attorney General to weighs prosecutorial discretion with exceptional political bias... ...NWO's Agents and Useful Idiots don't realize the horror that will be unleashed as they foment a global crisis... • Reply • Share › Gunnar Forsgren (<- in photo) • 20 days ago This fundamental Youtube clip of a RT news aired back in 2011 convinced me back then. It all made sense at the time: Hillary alleged email confirming strengthens this further. Saddam Hussein wanted to switch from dollar to oil trade in Euro. See what happened to him. see more • Reply • Share › Silverado • 20 days ago Crooked Hillary the traitor and still running for President? This country is F'd up, well at least the left wing criminal neocon part is... • Reply • Share › John Galt • 24 days ago How long before the masses wake up? • Reply • Share › Silverado John Galt • 20 days ago I think it's happening as we type... Reply Share › Janine • a month ago Let me guess the "Sub-Saharan black Africans" also happen to frequently be Christian? • Reply • Share › veggiedude • a month ago This has always been known as the motive. The emails only verify. • Reply • Share › Rachman Cantrell • 2 months ago Seems mainstream news will parrot anything people like Hillary and her minions say, whether it is true or not! I doubt that any of this will be on TV or in my local newspaper! • Reply • Share › arromas B • 2 months ago all true • Reply • Share › NURREDIN • 2 months ago Here's what you people ranting and raving about Hillary need to know about Libya.NATO decided Khaddafi had to go when he demanded payment for his oil IN GOLD. He was also attempting to establish a Pan-African version of the Euro backed by gold. The IMF and the World bank don't have that kind of money. Since the largest gold deposits in the world are in South Africa and North Korea,NATO had a decision to make.If every African and Middle eastern country demanded gold for their natural resources, the Western paper dollar money system would go bankrupt.Either Khaddafi had to go,or your current lifestyle.Which decision was the right one? • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas • 2 months ago TRUMP 2016 ! ! ! ! • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas • 2 months ago Hillary Clinton is a horrible witch globalist criminal and she should be in jail. How long did it take for General Petraes to be prosecuted? Not long at all. And Hillary's crimes go way way beyond anything he did. Gimme a break! • Reply • Share › Lisa Gunther • 2 months ago This really pisses me off to know that our own media can't be trusted. You are our 5th estate and responsible for keeping the government honest. Major FAIL. What you buy, everything hook, line and sinker? I agree that if this is true, Hillary is one the docket. Ghadiffi (aka, that socialist) was well revered in his country, but since he wouldn't conform to your puppet systems of leaders, therefore requiring him to die, and that the West used to control the Middle East and Africa (aka, Muslims). Only because of their natural resources. I agree that Hillary should hang for this BS. You take the poorest continent and use it for your own gain? I thought were done with that feudal shit. Plus that worked out so well with our Iraqi neighbors; um, who did they give their oil contract to: China. We spent several trillion $ to acquire their oil; because of our dependence on foreign oil, we have created a national security nightmare; we are forced to keep up face for regimes we would not tolerate in other circumstances aka the Saudis. Obviously that didn't turn out in our favor. Proving once again that you can't gain anything from invading other people for your own benefit. If that is the case, why haven't we invaded Saudi Arabia for our oil: I'll tell you why ~ the primary family is ruled by a bunch of religious assholes, who further a command of religious intolerance that we would never put up with; they also create terrorists with their religious concepts. If we didn't need their oil and we can afford to piss them off, lest we be with out the one thing that keeps this economy running. Both GWB and his dad sucked up to the royal family there; how did you like those $4-5/gallon oil prices? Apparently you can't control them, even if you suck talking to your own best friends (aka as the Saudis). What is going to happen if they cut us off? I'll tell you ~ complete anarchy. • Reply • Share › Cameron Douglas Lisa Gunther • 2 months ago You are a fool if you still think our meddling in the middle east is to get their oil! Wake up! Get off MSM! The ultimate goal is global control. Fnck oil...they don't need it. Reply Share › zumaan andrade • 3 months ago Liberal, conservative, far left,far right. who cares they are all a bloody bunch of murderers. Hillary, Bushes, Obama, Bill yes and Reagan. The whole political system answer to big money. That's who put them there and big money is insatiable can never be filled hence war. In ashamed to be an American. Alto of ppl will hide their conscience about us. I won't we suck. As for The Donald he said in 2003 that everybody has a price so im thinking... He will sell us out too. • Reply • Share › Syed Arbab Ahmed • 3 months ago USA,NATO, UK, Europe etc repeated the Afghanistan chapter with Iraq, Syria & Libya? http://bit.ly/qA1A9Z • Reply • Share › Drifting Sun • 3 months ago America thrives in the indulgence of the rest of the world, they know it is now or never; on the other hand, it will take at least two more generations to fully understand how America operates and manipulates the world to their favor, by then ALL the atrocities will be a thing of the distant past and won’t be remembered. America’s new generations will feel fully entitled to the pillage done by their predecessors, claiming there is no evidence of any wrong doings as the government destroys any evidence to avoid the past being brought upon them, it is up to you American and non-American to tell your kids what is going on, one day they will be able to fully take care of this mess, and change the world. • Reply • Share › Shay Davis • 4 months ago We've missed so many opportunities in this country to do the right thing. One more symptom of the elitist sickness is having this over inflated sense of entitlement that says its okay to wreck peoples lives for profit. Nevermind what kind it is; money, power, favor, etc.. I can't help but think if Gore had been elected we might be world leaders in climate change right now instead of deservedly being hated for once again destabilizing the ME. Looks like we're poised to coronate a U.S. queen who is going to continue to do more of the same. She rightly belongs in big house, not the White House. • Reply • Share › nmp • 4 months ago quel surprise. an internet article long on speculation with a tiny morsel of fact. • Reply • Share › corners • 4 months ago After the panama papers, it makes me wonder what gadafi had on western leaders. • Reply • Share › stinkingbadge • 4 months ago Silly • Reply • Share › Chronic Pain Coop • 5 months ago Hillary clintons top secret emails and Fukushima http://www.dispensaryexchange.... • Reply • Share › Sisi Ni Wale Wabaya • 5 months ago Its the same strategy being employed in Syria, Yemen, Iran and Ukraine, only that this time round, the Russians simply blocked it.....and apparently the west, cannot do anything to counter it.....President Putin is simply too smart and sharp for the West's conniving politicians.... But i think President Trump will find a way of working with Russia, bringing about geo strategic balace. • Reply • Share › kudus • 5 months ago link is broken again • Reply • Share › Persianized Mongol • 5 months ago First Saddam, then Ghaddafi and now they are pushing for Assad but thank God Russia stepped in. • Reply • Share › last first • 5 months ago "page not found" on the foia links. wonder why. so much for freedom of information and transparency of government in "the greatest nation on earth" • Reply • Share › JD101 • 5 months ago American stupidity leads to more world chaos and death. What a surprise. • Reply • Share › david desorcy • 6 months ago It is true, we have known this since it happened. Only fools get fake news from the propaganda media. • Reply • Share › Jacques Bergier • 6 months ago this is terrible. • Reply • Share › ReadTagliavini • 6 months ago The email links don't work - anyone have them/ can point to them? • Reply • Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod ReadTagliavini • 6 months ago I've updated the piece with links to archived copies of the emails. Reply Share › Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago So France was worried about the gold based currency a 3rd world country leader was maybe thinking of introducing and started an air campaign and toppled its leader because of it? this is the real conspiracy theory, not the campaign itself, as the article claims. The reasons for the campaign at the time were plain and simple, Qaddafi's offensive on the civilians, especially at Benghazi which he was bombing and moving his armed columns into when the air campaign began. This was shown on CNN. And what is the source for this supposed email from somebody to Hillary about the gold issue? There's no reference given. Who wrote the email, that's not even clear. And he talks about "Hillary's death squads" but the only relevance to a death squad in what follows is that the rebels killed captured foreign mercenaries. • Reply • Share › Ferit Tuzer Ferit Tuzer • 6 months ago you can see that this email was written in a non-serious manner, by an unknown person, and those allegations are just his interpretation. https://web.archive.org/.../DO... Reply Share › ephiroll • 6 months ago Supposidly this is the web cach of the actual email before it was pulled. I found this story here trying to verify it, the only other source I've found so far is this: http://anonhq.com/46716-2/ http://webcache.googleusercont... • Reply • Share › jackedup • 7 months ago Just another of many examples of wars being run, at the very top, by the private central banks. Look at every country that threatens our worthless dollar, they get invaded quickly. • Reply • Share › Justintime • 7 months ago Press Contact: Kelsey Davenport, Research Analyst; (202) 463-8270 x102 Updated: February 2014 On December 19, 2003, long-time Libyan President Moammar Gaddafi stunned much of the world by renouncing Tripoli’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs and welcoming international inspectors to verify that Tripoli would follow through on its commitment. Following Gaddafi’s announcement, inspectors from the United States, United Kingdom, and international organizations worked to dismantle Libya’s chemical and nuclear weapons programs, as well as its longest-range ballistic missiles. Washington also took steps toward normalizing its bilateral relations with Tripoli, which had essentially been cut off in 1981. Libya’s decision has since been characterized as a model for other states suspected of developing WMD in noncompliance with their international obligations to follow. Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control Stephen Rademaker stated May 2, 2005 during the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference that Libya’s choice “demonstrates that, in a world of strong nonproliferation norms, it is never too late to make the decision to become a fully compliant NPT state,” noting that Tripoli’s decision has been “amply rewarded.” Tripoli’s disarmament was also a success story for the U.S. intelligence community, which uncovered and halted some of the assistance Libya was being provided by the nuclear smuggling network led by Pakistani nuclear official Abdul Qadeer Khan. At that time, the U.S. intelligence community was being harshly criticized for its failures regarding Iraq’s suspected WMD programs. The factors that induced Libya to give up its weapons programs are debatable. Many Bush administration officials have emphasized the U.S.-led 2003 invasion of Iraq, as well as the October 2003 interdiction of a ship containing nuclear-related components destined for Libya, as key factors in Tripoli’s decision. But outside experts argue that years of sanctions and diplomatic efforts were more important. they wanted him gone https://www.armscontrol.org/fa... see more • Reply • Share › Justintime • 7 months ago Goldman Sachs: Making Money by Stealing It By Stephen Lendman Global Research, March 17, 2012 sjlendman.blogspot.ca 17 March 2012 Money power in private hands and democracy can’t co-exist. Wall Street crooks transformed America into an unprecedented money making racket. Goldman symbolizes master of the universe of financial manipulation (Reuters April 16, 2011) It’s been involved in nearly all financial scandals since the 19th century. It makes money the old-fashioned way, through market manipulation, the scamming of investors, bribing political Washington, having its executives in top administration posts, and getting open-ended low or no interest rate bailouts when needed. It’s business model and culture assure billions of bonus dollars for company officials, complicit traders, and others on the take. Compared to Goldman, Bernie Madoff was small-time. Former bank regulator expert on white-collar crime, public finance, economics, and related law, Bill Blackexplained Goldman shenanigans pertaining to earlier SEC charges this way: http://www.globalresearch.ca/g... • Reply • Share › Justintime • 7 months ago Libya: Ten Things About Gaddafi They Don’t Want You to Know By Global Research News http://www.globalresearch.ca/l... • Reply • Share › Evangelina Aguilar • 7 months ago time to send this woman to jail, please would the strong stand up adn do something? we know obama wont do a thing, he is afraid of the clinton dynasty ,and machinery, so maybe Trump? i hope she rottens in jail. • Reply • Share › Sammaye • 7 months ago Hmm some of this article, especially the end is a stretch. For example, you have no real evidence that a currency announced almost 20 years ago and refused by the AL (hence why Gaddafi never implemented it, because Libya could not hold up the currency on it's own). All you provide is that they described it in a email. Yes, it was of concern back when Gaddafi pushed for it but that was a long time ago. The email quoted more like makes the case of supporting the Libyan armies with what gold is left. Tbh I think the case of oil share and influence was actually driving factors. Remember, this is merely an adviser in an office who believes this. There is still not much evidence behind the emails. There is no direct quote as to why France has an invested economic interest, in fact America seems completely unaware of it too, hence the wording "unseen". If they believed that Gaddafi's gold currency was a problem to them I am sure they would have made a threat assessment of it, but they didn't. The email you quote in the last section actually tries to give some credibility to what was proposed as rumours. As for the rape of Misrata, HRW has since been and their verdict was inconclusive, they couldn't say one way or the other that it did not happen. They noted that women in Misrata had been raped but, to what extent, they did not know; nor could they attribute it with undeniable evidence. So that story might not be totally fake, maybe exaggerated by the rebel forces. But you should know that the battlefield is so full of shit at times that you can never truly trust information from it. Most rebels work from hysteria as it is, even now. Also the email quoted in the second to last section is a stretch and half as well to your conclusion and requires some inventive thinking. Also I think you miss quoted the first quote email about special forces. I believe the English actually states that French and English special forces were only handing weapons and supplies. So this entire article seems a stretch at times to an imaginative conclusion. see more • Reply • Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Sammaye • 7 months ago Hmm some of this article, especially the end is a stretch. For example, you have no real evidence that a currency... US State Department emails stating explicitly that Gaddafi's proposed gold-backed currency was a motive for the Western intervention isn't evidence that this was a motive for the Western intervention? Reply Share › Sammaye Jeremy R. Hammond • 7 months ago What is also interesting is that even after this gold was found out "shortly" after, it wasn't until the LNC said they would reorganise oil contracts to favour those who helped them that the West turned around and said "Hmm, maybe we can get a better deal with these guys, after all it isn't some small time rebellion, this feels like the one". Of course, to not make themselves look inconsistent they had to get involved in Syria... Reply Share › Sammaye Jeremy R. Hammond • 7 months ago You must remember that email was an advisor's belief as to the motivations for France's intervention. Not only that but they seemed unclear about France's true economic interest in the area and clearly labelled it as "unseen". • Reply • Share › Beedogz • 7 months ago Plus Hillary and Obama violated the War Powers Act with the Libyan combat orders. NO approval from congress. Bush would have been impeached by democrats if he had done the same. • Reply • Share › IHC • 7 months ago That also explains how Goldman Sachs - who Ghaddafi used to invest 3.5 billion dollars in Gold - conveniently 'lost' his money right about the time Hillary started inventing the story of Ghaddafi killing his citizens. Remember black op 'Zero Footprint' - as the label is self explanatory! • Reply • Share › womanity constancy • 7 months ago See "international security and infrastructural contractors": there's the fix unthinkable, done. Immediate prosecution should proceed, of course, with substantial evidence. But. But? Clip Clinton's laughter at getting Gaddafi with W Bush joking about "wmd's gotta be somewhere" for essence of U.S. foreign policy. What World Court? What UN? Excuse me, only Sen. Bernie Sanders even vaguely addresses the crisis. • Reply • Share › Holden (Arjan den Hollander) • 7 months ago 143 tons is not a lot, and won't be enough to destabilize anything. Continental European reserves will be more than 10.000 tonnes. • Reply • Share › priffe • 7 months ago This kind of reporting is where the delusional far right and the (no less) delusional far left find common ground in throwing wild accusations around. Qadafi used extreme violence to control his population, such as missiles and heavy machine guns against demonstrators. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/blo... If there was any hope that anyone in hisinner circles could lead Libya in another direction, that was effectively quenched when his son and heir Seif al Islam promised to turn the streets into "rivers of blood". Qadafi had to go, but it was Sarkozy not Hillary who held the axe. Of course this was part of a larger power struggle but hardly about 143 measly tons of gold. • Reply • Share › Skeptic • 7 months ago The other key reason that Gadaffi was taken down was that he planned to create a pan African oil exchange not denominated in the US petrodollar. US was having none of that. • Reply • Share › David in MA • 7 months ago OK, Now, where does the Clinton foundation fit into all this? • Reply • Share › Areminder David in MA • 7 months ago Everywhere! 1 Reply Share › Francisco Machado David in MA • 7 months ago Stay tuned and watch this serial drama unfold episode by episode. The book isn't finished. You'll just have to wait for the next chapter to be published - which is being delayed by every effort of the creator. Will all the subplots be tied together in the end? Wait and see. • Reply • Share › nigger • 7 months ago The USA is like isis, these Europeans are lucky to be in the usa. They are thieves, • Reply • Share › bjeanfreau7 • 7 months ago France was running some kind of racket with their former currency. Hell, France no longer uses the franc themselves! The invasion of Iraq really had the same pretext...Saddam Hussein was pricing his oil in Euros instead of the almighty US dollar. Couldn't have that now could we? {sarcasm} • Reply • Share › Areminder bjeanfreau7 • 7 months ago But the u.n. had sanctioned saddam so that he was ONLY supposed to be able to sell enough oil to buy food and medicine for his people. (Which he sold for weapons.) Frank Rich (whom bill clinton pardoned) was the main go between for saddam and sarkosy in their collaboration to get around the sanctions. You can bet SOMEONE was donating to the Clinton Foundation in that mess. Reply Share › Jason Methystine • 7 months ago If this story is credible she should definitely be impeached after her first or second term as President Https://www.HillaryClinton.com... • Reply • Share › Akraim Fowad • 7 months ago Mr Brad Hoff I think the story of gold currency is real Joke, we can add it to Viagra mass rape....etc. France, westerns, Nato and others has found Libyans in condition of exasperation and indignation from the chaos and the destroying of the army and the country's administration and the absurd silly ideas that he imposed on them. It's not important what the western think in, the very important factor is what the Libyans was need and feel. Without this factor, nobody : westerns or others can do nothing. • Reply • Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod Akraim Fowad • 7 months ago Funny how the diplomatic cables, then, show what Mr. Hoff says they show, as opposed to supporting your view that the expressed concerns about the people of Libya was anything more than a transparent pretext. Reply Share › John C. Turmel, B. Eng. • 7 months ago Jct: They can't stop the truth from coming out about Yankee crimes directed by the Wicked Witch of the West herself. • Reply • Share › Ganesh • 7 months ago https://www.foia.state.gov/sea... This is an absolutely massive story. • Reply • Share › Robert Lettner • 7 months ago People need to wake up before all this starts over again in Saudi Arabia and Iran! • Reply • Share › inkadinkadoo • 7 months ago Who is going to hang them when everybody is bought and paid for? • Reply • Share › katsmow • 7 months ago Why is Blumenthal discussing classified information with Hilary in the first place, when he was barred from working for the State Department by the Administration?? • Reply • Share › Johann • 7 months ago I think you would all be shocked at how unremarkable this type of politics is in history. • Reply • Share › kent • 7 months ago Get thePDF from the .gov site, thanks. Now spread that sht around before they take it down. https://www.foia.state.gov/sea... • Reply • Share › Sgt. Stedenko • 7 months ago Vast right wing conspiracy • Reply • Share › esqualido • 7 months ago With no attempt to beatify Gaddafi, he might well have stayed alive had he put the nation's gold and silver in the hands of his own people instead of some repository begging to be looted. That fact is, no nation today is a friend of the people in monetary matters. A return to honest money is as simple as making the soi called "security strip" in money out of gold, or silver- that would offer them some security! • Reply • Share › HillaryofArabia esqualido • 7 months ago That's what he was trying to do with the gold dinar, if you actually read the article you would know this. I am resisting the urge to call you stupid, and am patting myself on the back for not doing it. 1 Reply Share › nubwaxer • 7 months ago this reeks of right wing extremist propaganda. • Reply • Share › Jeremy R. Hammond Mod nubwaxer • 7 months ago Your comment reeks of ideologically induced willful ignorance. 4 Reply Share › Rome Cruci Jeremy R. Hammond • 7 months ago in other words he, (nubwaxer) knows whats going on and he's a fuckin liar ! 1 Reply Share › Chris Mitchell nubwaxer • 7 months ago The left-right paradigm is propaganda. 1 • Reply • Share › --------------------- - BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic: Hillary Emails Reveal True Motive for Libya Intervention by Brad Hoff1/6/16 Jeffrey - Sunday, August 14 2016, 19:59:50 (UTC) Interesting comments from this article... Jeffrey - 08/14 20:04

Connection: close X-varnish: 561769474 X-forwarded-for: 173.13.27.45 X-onecom-forwarded-proto: http X-onecom-forwarded-ip: 173.13.27.45 Content-length: 118668 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Cookie: *hidded* Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Hillary_Emails_Reveal_True_Motive_for_Libya_Intervention_by_Brad_Hoff... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0 Host: www.insideassyria.com

Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9