The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> OVER HERE!!!!

OVER HERE!!!!
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Tuesday, March 6 2012, 4:25:55 (UTC)
from *** - *** Mexico - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

Arrow wrote:
> science would lead us to believe in the Easter Rabbit, walking on water and a Cookie Monster too.

...explain how....why on earth would science even try to...and how would it do it? Postulate for us an experiment in which science could prove, or lead to, the existernce of any of them? Don`t just say things to say things...we`re actually thinking and expending effort...don`t think that time isn`t precious, or that by writing so much we mean it isn`t.....come on, respect yourself.
>
>As I said, the "God theory" explains a natural event. Pigs on Mars, Easter rabbits and Cookie monsters do not.

...how is God a natural event? And how is a pig not? You`re going in circles...I asked you prove his existence...God is as natural as a pig. Does it bother you that I said flyign pigs? Okay, forget the wings...let`s just say there is a pig on Mars, a pig is certainly a natural thing...now explain to me how, if you can`t PROVE there is no such pig on Mars, it means there MUST be...or MIGHT be.

We can postulate as many theories as we want, but there's no need to discuss them if they do not explain something.

..oh come on! To postulate a god at all is preposterous...it`s just that people have gotten used to the notion...but the world isn`t flat, no matter how many people believe it is, or how used to the idea they once were...you`re clearly trying to dodge what you must folow...YOU are the one who suggests a God...therefore YOU have to prove it...you cannot ask me to DISPROVE it, and then say that because I can`t, then he MUST or MIGHT be real. It`s that simple...I refuse to believe you don`t understand exactly where I`m going with this.and you don`t want to get there.
>
> > Can any historical event be verified?
>
>...of course. That doesn't even require a single example. Well okay, The Vietnam War happened.
>
>The Vietnam war is very recent. How about we go back further in time.

...depends far back in time...depends on whether there are corroborating sources or only one witness..also depends on the evnt...if it is fantastical and goes against all we know of natural law, we have right to eb suspicious...if it happened only once, and all we have as evidence is hearsay....then we would be foolish to believe it.



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9