The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Oh, The Pain of The Believer

Oh, The Pain of The Believer

Posted by Marcello (Guest) - Tuesday, August 30 2011, 16:13:04 (UTC) from 71.160.32.228 - pool-71-160-32-228.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: http://us.mg1.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand Website title: Redirect

Oh, The Pain of The Believer -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Danny Schechter Tuesday, August 30, 2011 Journalists are not supposed to have political opinions, and yet we all do. Our “biases” are usually disguised, not blatant or overtly partisan, and can be divined in what stories we cover and how we cover them. Even ‘just the fact’s ma’am’ journos for big Media have to decide which facts to include and which to ignore. Our outlooks are always shaped by our worldviews, values and experience, not too mention the outlets we work for. Which brings me to the challenge of seeking truth and recognizing it when you see it. I have to admit that I was seduced by the idea of Barack Obama. The idea of a black President, the idea of a young President, the idea of an articulate President, and the idea of a man married to such a stand up women from a working class family was hard to resist. Here’s a guy who seemed really smart, not just because he went to Harvard but because professors there I liked were impressed with him. (I taught at Harvard, and know very well how not so smart many students there can be!) In the end, it doesn’t mean much, but in that period he lived about a block away from the House I once shared on Dartmouth Street in Somerville. Was that a degree of separation? He had also been a community organizer, starting in politics at the grass roots in Chicago. I also worked at Saul Alinsky-style organizing and even knew the iconic organizer personally. Was that another degree? He’s invoked the spirit of the civil rights movement but was not part of it. He treated Dr. King as a monument before the new memorial was conceived, embracing him as a symbol of the past, not a guide to the future. He took an anti-war stance on pragmatic grounds only, preferring Afghanistan to Iraq. He hasn’t extricated us from either battlefield. His strategy borrowed heavily from the Bush Doctrine. What’s the difference, really, as US troops now intervene worldwide and Guantanamo remains open for business? There was a lot I didn’t know. I didn’t know the backgrounds of those that groomed him and funded him. His relationship with the centrist DLC was murky as were the details on the services he performed for a shadowy firm, Business International, said to have CIA links. There were those who warned, but, I guess, I didn’t want to listen. Why? I didn’t want to reinforce my own skepticism and sense of despair. I feigned at being hopeful even as I took quite a few critical whacks at his positions in my blog. His deviations from a liberal agenda and his paeans to the “free market” were considered necessary for his “electability.” I was also influenced by the euphoria for him overseas that had become infectious but has since soured. To be honest, I was so disgusted with eight years of George Bush for all the right reasons that I wanted him gone full stop, as did millions of Americans. Hillary didn’t appeal to me, not because she’s a woman but because of her slavish affinity for the Israel lobby and middle of the road Democrats. (Yes, Obama, did his mea-culpa to AIPAC too!) I was denounced as a super sexist by a few for not buying into her centrist Clintonista crusade. She had gone from a student advocate to part of a ruling family; he went from bottom-up activism to top-down elitism. When she joined his “team,” you knew they were always in the same league. When the right bashed him for associating with radical Bill Ayers, who I knew, it made me suspect he might even be cooler than I thought, even as he raced to distance himself. His membership in Reverend Wright’s church hinted at a deeper consciousness until he buckled in the media heat and threw the man that married him under the bus. And yet, I wanted to believe because I needed to believe, needed to believe it was possible to change the American behemoth, to believe that, as he kept saying, “it could be different this time.” As the late writer David Foster Wallace put it, “In the day-to-day trenches of adult life…there is no such thing as not worshipping. Everybody worships. The only choice we get is what to worship… else (what) you worship will eat you alive. If you worship money and things - if they are where you tap real meaning in life - then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough.” So, in a sense, I became a worshipper like so many, not of the man or the dance he was doing in an infected political environment, but because I convinced myself that I worshipped possibility, that there are times when the unexpected, even the unbelievable occurs. I had seen Mandela go from prison to the presidency of South Africa. After all, how does a progressive blast a candidate who has Bruce Springsteen and Pete Seeger singing the uncensored version of “This Land Is Your Land” at his inaugural?” Yet, there was always a nagging question: was he with us or just co-opting us? Yes We Can? Slowly, despite the glow and the aura, deeper truths surfaced, realities I had winked away. Its not surprising that his mantra has gone, as the Washington Post reports, from the “fierce urgency of now,” to “Be patient, democracy is big and tough and messy.” Yes, I knew, I may have been rationalizing a false god, who was only another, if more attractive, politician who says one thing and does another in a political system where power, not personalities, prevail. Like many of his predecessors he would be “captured” by the power structures, by the military men and contractors at the Pentagon and the money men on Wall Street. He was in office but never really in charge. Clearly, he didn’t have the votes to enact a real change agenda. But that was because his own party was long ago bought and paid for. He never had a chance, even if as I wanted to believe, he wanted one. He said he wanted to be transformational figure but the system transformed him—and quickly. Everyone runs “against Washington,” even a Senator, who was part of it. And so I held my nose and voted, hoping against my wiser instincts. I even made a positive film about the campaign that showed how he used social media and texting to mobilize new voters. When I tried to get a copy to the White House, through an insider there, I found they couldn’t be less interested. By then, he had gone from playing the “outside game” to opting into the “inside game” built around compromise in the name of “pragmatism, or ‘getting it done,” in his words. In the end he was a rookie who may have outsmarted himself or just served the interests who put him there. He couldn’t dump his most passionate and issue-oriented followers fast enough. While his backers were still hot to trot, he became cooler toward them, and, in effect, repudiated them with few progressive appointments. He put on his flag pin and relished the symbolism of the “office.” He became the master of the uplifting speech disguising a quite different policy agenda. He spoke for the people but served the power. His wanted the other side to love him too, even as his stabs at “bi-partisanship” proved non-starters. When you lie down with those “lambs,” (or is it snakes?) you betray not only supporters, but their hopes. FDR was soon spinning in his grave. I am not surprised that knowledgeable critics of his economic policies not only consider him bull-headed and wrong, but, actually corrupt, aligned and complicit, with the banksters who are still ripping us off. No wonder he’s ”bundled” more donations from the greedsters and financiers this year than in 2008! No wonder, he turned his back on consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren and is trying to kill prosecutions of bank fraud in high places. Christopher Whalen who writes for Reuters say there will be a cost for his doing nothing, “The path of least resistance politically has been to temporize and talk. But by following the advice of Rubin and Summers, and avoiding tough decisions about banks and solvency, President Obama has only made the crisis more serious and steadily eroded public confidence. In political terms, Obama is morphing into Herbert Hoover.” Yet, at the same time, many of us who now know how we have been used, will vote for him again, because, as he rightly calculates, there is no one else, and the alternative is even worse. Watch and weep as today’s rebels become next year’s rationalizers. It reminds me of when activists were asked to vote for Lyndon Johnson in 1964 with the slogan “Part of the Way with LBJ.” That way ended with an endless escalation of war in Vietnam, and guns trumping butter. Sound familiar? The search for truth and reality has hit a wall but has to continue. The lessons need to be learned. We have to say we were wrong, when we were, not in our beliefs, but in pinning our hopes on a shrewd, ambitious, and double-faced political performance artist. While people who still back him dismiss the accusation that’s he’s a hidden socialist, Kenyan, or space alien, all too many suspect he may be a secret Republican. He is who he is, aloof, cautious, and a man in the middle. He’s staying there. Let’s give David Foster the last word. “The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day. That is real freedom. The alternative is unconsciousness,… … It is about simple awareness - awareness of what is so real and essential, so hidden in plain sight all around us, that we have to keep reminding ourselves, over and over…” Filmmaker and News Dissector Danny Schechter edits the Newsdissector.com blog. He directed “Barack Obama: People’s President” (2009) for a South African media company. Comment On This ZNet Article See All Comments (1) Don't give up yet By Wiley, Jason at Aug 30, 2011 14:40 PM Don't give up yet Dr. Schechter. I think that when given the opportunity Pres. Obama will step up to the plate. The time has not yet been ripe for him to do so but the fact that this extremist right wing movement has taken over Washington is very quickly preparing the appropriate circumstances for some major changes to take place. Voters are going to be coming out in record numbers as a counter-response against this tea party movement and quite possibly the democrats could have a majority in the house and senate. And it won't be business as usual because the people that created those majorities are going to demand that major initiatives are taken to curb the excesses of corporate greed and to end the reign of Reagonomics and the influence of such lowly characters as Grover Norquist. There are people movements forming. One in particular, the "Rebuild the Dream" movement, has close to 300,000 members signed up in just a few months. Go to moveon.org and check it out. There is a lot of good information on the site and more meetings are scheduled for next month in thousands of cities and towns across the nation. One great thing that is coming out of the presence of this tea party movement and their direct attacks on the middle and lower classes is that voter apathy is going to be radically reduced. The general masses of people are being forced to take an interest in politics simply to survive. Combined with the tools of social networking we are poised to see an unprecedented rise in voter turnout and a radical shift in the way people participate in politics. On every level of life we are being forced to advocate for ourselves and we have weapons of advocacy that are unique in the evolution of mankind. Facebook and tweeter are revolutionizing political advocacy movements. The Huffington Post is revolutionizing participatory democracy in new and innovating ways. The establishment wants us to believe these are dire times and the economic numbers would seem to indicate that they are but the fact of the matter is how we assess our own self worth is radically shifting. Our false monetary value system is becoming obsolete. It has become so distorted in serving its actual purpose of representing real value that we have collectively lost faith in it. Our younger generations have very little faith in the credibility of our current monetary system. They give it about a 550. And that is being generous. The establishment would like us to believe that we are down and out but a more bright perspective on the situation is things are quite the opposite. We are in the process of changing our currency. Black gold, quite frankly, is becoming socially obsolete. Our new currency is social currency. Above all else we value people above profits. We value working together to make the world a better place for all life, rather than better for a chosen few. We ignore the system of false monetary constraints that is apparently limiting our freedoms for the sake of the economic growth of a chosen few. These so-called bad economic numbers are an illusion. We are actually more socially empowered than every before in our history if we can just realize it. It is just a matter of changing our consciousness. The potential for an active participatory democracy unlike anything the world has every seen is right at our fingertips if only we could realize it. The President is advocating for the power of the people in subtle ways and does not take the credit as such. It is a covert mission of his that he leads by example in his pursuit of raising the bar of government transparency and participatory democracy. Their are subtle dynamics in the spirit of his actions that are revolutionizing participatory democracy to its core. They are not necessarily news making events or front page stories but are progressive and substantial improvements that will shape the way we do politics for generations to come. When we look back at his Presidency 20 years from now we will be able to see that there actually was very substantial progressive changes being made but they were part of a covert tactical mission to change the very foundation of the establishment itself. The end result will hopefully be a new breed of transparency and accountability on all levels of government which will produce a newfound paradigm of trust in each other which is really where our greatest drought is today. Our greatest drought today is not economic. Our greatest drought in the world today is our general lack of trust in each other. The President by his very nature is making a lot of progress towards rebuiding that trust. We need to be patient and give him the benefit of the doubt. --------------------- - BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic: Oh, The Pain of The Believer Marcello - Tuesday, August 30 2011, 16:13:04 (UTC) Re: Oh, The Pain of The Believer pancho - 08/30 18:48

Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/x-mfe-ipt, application/x-ms-... Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.4Hpz. Accept-language: en-us User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR ... Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Host: www.insideassyria.com Content-length: 16178 Connection: close Cache-control: no-cache Cookie: *hidded*

Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9