Re: Apology to Tiglath |
Posted by
Tiglath
(Guest)
- Saturday, September 25 2010, 7:47:18 (UTC) from 123.2.151.230 - 123-2-151-230.static.dsl.dodo.com.au Australia - Windows NT - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
pancho wrote: >...I missed the total UN defiiniton...you had it right (but not Gewargis), but I still think itīs been watered down to mean almost anything...that being said, here is one that I find is in most agreement with what the majority say... > I see genocide as a scale in which the forced removal of children from their parents which is what Australia practised 40 years ago would be the lowest and less extreme form of genocide right up to the extreme state sponsored mass production line murder of the Jews that came to be labeled the Holocaust. Now putting aside history and the "who started it?" arguement, andwhat you consider a watered down definition, do you consider what the Turks did during WW1 genocide as defined by the UN? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 1001 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/jpeg, application/x-ms-application, image/gif, application/xaml+xml, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-xbap, applicati... Accept-language: en-AU Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Pragma: no-cache Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Apology_to_Tiglath-6CKg.KTlr.QUOTE User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; FunWebProducts; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.... |