Re: Corrections |
Posted by
Jeffrey
(Guest)
- Saturday, March 7 2009, 20:41:42 (CET) from 69.14.30.71 - d14-69-71-30.try.wideopenwest.com Commercial - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
I would ask them to include both: English, Cuneiform, *and* Aramaic. Then I would go see if you could ADD Arabic. Oh, that would piss the Christians off big-time. _______________ pancho wrote: >...We inscribed Ashurbanipal's name in English, Cuneiform and Estrangeli...in other words, Aramaic and NOT "Assyrian". I think they assumed that the Aramaic script is really Arabic while Cuneiform is Aramaic. > >...As the sculptor I'm going to write and ask them to correct the mistake...that is call cuneiform by it's rightful name, it is not Aramaic but cuneiform...but then again I might let them leave "Arabic" on there. > >...do you NOW understand why it's important to go outside this madhouse called Assyria? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 989 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Connection: keep-alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Keep-alive: 300 Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Corrections-03Du.0FVq.QUOTE User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7 |