Re: Dawkins' Agnosticism |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Thursday, March 1 2012, 22:32:40 (UTC) from *** - *** - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
Arrow wrote: >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9102740/Richard-Dawkins-I-cant-be-sure-God-does-not-exist.html > >Richard Dawkins recently described himself as an agnostic. He said "the probability of any supernatural creator existing is very very low". > >How low? Is 0.1% low enough? A slot machine has 3 reels, 10 symbols each. About a year ago, a friend of mine scored at the first trial. His machine rained coins... I guess God is not so improbable then! ...stop picking and choosing....what Dawkins believes is just that, what Dawkins BELIEVES. Dawkins can believe any number of things, doesn't make them true or even "likely". There is EVERY evidence that god doesn't exist and none that he "might"...I say EVERY sign and evidence and proof....there have been 30,000 gods claimed by the human race, at least...and we have shed almost each and every one of them along the way till we're down to a mere handful. And each of those gods allowed hisself to enter oblivion without uttering a single complaint...from what we know of what is claimed for Gods, this is not the way they operate...gods don;t go with a whimper...when a god goes he should go with fire roaring out his arse, according to his own literature...but he doesn't. As soon as the last human "believer" dies, or moves on, that god dies with him.....clearly there are no such things as gods EXCEPT they are thought of by humans, and they don't live "forever", but only until the last human forgets about them...I know, I know, no one wants to believe that about his god, but it's true...it's a TRUTH.....try denying it. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
*** |