The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: HUREYAT having sleepless NIGHTS Assyrian MUSLIM!

Re: HUREYAT having sleepless NIGHTS Assyrian MUSLIM!
Posted by AssyrianMuslim (Guest) - Friday, April 18 2008, 22:05:17 (CEST)
from 75.219.148.228 - 228.sub-75-219-148.myvzw.com Commercial - Windows Codename Longhorn - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

Jumblat wrote:
>AssyrianMuslim wrote:
>
>" think you misunderstood my name where it says "Muslim" it doesn't say "Christian" so I don't know no "infidels" because that was created by Christians during the crusades against Muslims and Jews. I only know of Kafirs and I am forbidden from murdering anyone except for a just cause such as self defense, murder and causing mischief. So no thanks, I am not interested in your suggestions. The funny thing about you is that no matter how hard you try you can never tolerate someone that is different "
>
>
>REPLY >>>
>
>If Islam doesn't have infidels, but they got ' KAFIRS ' it is the same, because Islam not warn people to associate with these KAFIRS only, they go after them and plunder them , at least CHRISTIANS they tolerate the INFIDELS to practice their way of life and not as ISLAM who is the main concern to PROTECT THE DOMAIN OF WAR /دار الحرب with any means and further EXPAND the other DOMAIN THE DOMAIN OF ISLAM / دار الاسلام .

No it is not the same at all. A "kafir" is someone who rejects, conceals, or covers up the truth knowingly. A kafir is not every non Muslim because of the simple fact that a person may not be aware or have knowledge. As for someone who has knowledge and intentionally rejects, conceals or covers up, such person would be a kafir. However, a person has the choice and just because someone is a kafir that does not give the right to kill them just because they chose to disbelieve. If a kafir chooses to fight or do other harm toward the Muslims, we have every right to defend ourselves and that is all. So, you just simply lied again and just take your own misunderstanding and prejudice opinion as a "solid fact". Islam can never and will never be forced on anyone because an honest person who uses his conscience and logic will recognize Islam as the truth because everyone is born with it.


































































Your Islam doesn't tolerate non Islamic people, but plunder them that is the reason your EMBLEM is the SWORD and most Arab Generals were awarded to be the SWORD of ISLAM, not because were tolerate, but because they achieved ISLAM through blood - just remember whenever you see a PHOTO of QUR'AN you will see underneath it the SWORD with those special words NO GOD BUT GOD AND MESSENGER OF GOD ! and for GOD sake what the sword do with a book you consider to be holy ? please answer that without spinning and detracting from my simple question and why good fighters have that title?


If Islam plunders people why is it you can not even back your opinion up? If Islam plunders people and does not tolerate, why does India have a Hindu population of over 80% how come they were not converted or intolerated? Can you answer these questions. You always shoot yourself in the foot by picking subjects wich will make you look stupid, and you suppose to be a champion of Assyria yet you can't even handle intellectual talks. You argue with prejudices and hold them as facts. You people have a lot of learning to do.
As for your sword, that is the Saudi flag and proves nothing. We know that Christianity was spread by the sword because no one was interested. The Pagans of Europe were intolerated and murdered by the tons for resisting conversion. All the Christians in Europe are the descendants of former pagans who had their parents and ancastors killed, or forcefully converted. It's not hard to gain converts when one kills the parents in order to raise the children as orphans under Christian nuns and people. That is how your Christianity was achieved and has a bloody history not in self defense but in converting and attacking people who refused baptism.

Islam has no such history where tons were killed for refusing conversion. Those non Muslims who did not want to give up their religions, were simply accepted in society as dhimmis and were governed by their own laws and leadership. So while Islam is a system that is complete, Christianity is not so because it can not tolerate non Christians because it is empty without complete guidance. The Christian kings were brutal and intolerant toward non Christians. Today it is no different but you try to do it in another way which is still obvious. If the Christian cults and denominations can not even tolerate themselves, how the hell they gonna tolerate Jews and Muslims who do not believe in 3 gods and believe in the key doctrines of mainstream Christianity which only became official in the 4th and 5th centuries.

I know what your problem is and why you have to always blame others for what your people are guilty of. It puzzles the prejudice Christians when they hear or read about Islam not being forced on people. They assume automatically that Islam had to be forced on people because that is the case with Christianity. They can not believe that it was not so and any one proves or acknowledges that Islam was not spread by force on people becomes a traitor and a bad person. Although Muslims did fight in self defense and for the protection of the Islamic ummah, it was never forced on people. You still have not been able to answer how the lands with highest Muslim populations like Indonesia have the largest Muslim population without ever witnessing an Islamic army, yet lands that were under Islamic rule for many centuries had booming economies and have for the most part remained Christians, Jews, Hindus or whatever. How can you explain that? And you have the nerves to claim that Christians were so tolerant? I need a face like yours seriously. What happen to the Jews and pagans who became victims of Christian bigotry and persecution? It wasn't until Muslims conquered Spain that they lived in peace. Ask any Jew when the Jews had their golden age, and he/she will answer during the Islamic era.

So, you are dead wrong and you want to argue with your opinion and prejudices. The funny thing is that I have quotes from harsh attackers of Islam yet they even had admit that Islam was not spread by the sword. You can believe what you like and I can not convince you that a wall is white if you believe that it orange no matter what but I don't have to go and argue with my own opinion to prove that Islam was not spread by force.



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 7310
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-application, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument, appli...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_HUREYAT_having_sleepless_NIGHTS_Assyrian_MUSLIM-06Ka.Zaqx.QUOTE
Ua-cpu: x86
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9