The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: H.G.Wells on Islam

Re: H.G.Wells on Islam

Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Friday, March 15 2013, 16:04:03 (UTC)
from *** - ***

Mexico -

Windows NT -

Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

Muhammad was a man, not a god, or son of god, or ghost of god, he wasn't even a pigeon of god....it was blasphemy to Muslims to claim any sort of godship for Muhammad...therefore, as a man, he was prone to human frailties and the customs of his time...as far as multiple wives; Christians, like Newt Gingrich, also take multiple wives, only they get rid of previous ones to do it...Muhammad, and all Muslim men, mostly added to the number of their wives but always under the rule that each wife had to be treated equally and fairly...something Gingrich didn't bother with....King Richard II of England married a six-year old....he was "expected" not to try conjugal relations with her right away, as other child brides had died as a result of too-early consummation...but we don't know...maybe he just fondled her without penetrating her, or maybe just her mouth...who knows...so like Rashad I ask...what is your point?

No one was praising Muhammad...Wells wasn't and I wasn't...we were just stating verifiable facts. You have a problem with facts?

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:

H.G.Wells on Islam pancho - Friday, February 13 2009, 20:05:23 (CET)
- Re: H.G.Wells on Islam dyslexicmalsi - 03/15 01:28
  - Re: H.G.Wells on Islam Rashad - 03/15 06:09
    - Re: H.G.Wells on Islam pancho - 03/15 16:04
      - Re: H.G.Wells on Islam Rashad - 03/15 18:09
      - Re: H.G.Wells on Islam pancho - 03/15 18:18
        Re: H.G.Wells on Islam Rashad - 03/15 19:59
- Re: H.G.Wells on Islam Bob - 06/20 15:23
  - Re: H.G.Wells on Islam pancho - 06/20 16:52
    - yeah bob Rashad - 06/20 18:38
      - how this works pancho - 06/20 18:46
        Re: how this works Rashad - 06/21 02:47

***