Re: Hitchens wont admit it... |
Posted by
Rashad
(Guest)
- Friday, January 14 2011, 10:03:04 (UTC) from 74.136.110.155 - 74-136-110-155.dhcp.insightbb.com Commercial - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
It's worse because Hitchens believes this helpless old woman, who happens to have a religion other from what that Anglo is accustomed to, is his enemy and a danger to his way of life. It isn't the U.S who has bases around the world and who invades countries thousands of miles away that is the danger but it is the rape victim fighting back. I can see how quickly this "champion" would change his own concept of it were Muslims invading tiny Christian nations thousands of miles away. The other thing is how Hitchens and Harris both ask us to imagine what kind of world we would have if Muslims obtained nuclear missiles but how do they know what will happen when none have ever even bothered learning to make them. The U.S used atomic weapons on Japan and there have been reports that dirty weapons have been used in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam and other places. I just read a newspaper article recently where it was admitted that the CIA had injected thousands of people in Guatemala with STDS. Muslims have never done such things and we also know what Muslims have done in the past when they did have the power to do what the U.S is doing. Muslims could have conquered all of Europe and they all would be Muslim and speaking Arabic today but they didn't do any of that. So I believe Hitchens should be more worried about the warmongers he supports instead of helpless people fighting back against oppression and occupation. But I know these people are a bunch of racist bigots and not sincere people who are heartbroken whenever any group of people are fucked over. They pretend to care so much for Muslim women because they wear hijabs yet have supported wars against the same people, rape etc. After all this, the rapist is wrong for fighting back? I wish my brother Malcolm was alive today so he could smoke this fool or I wish Farrakhan wasn't so caught up with other issues would take on this wimp and smoke him because he is superior to all them in speaking. When you're a great speaker, you can put anyone to shame even when you are wrong at times. If I was a somebody, were not so raw and had great speaking ability, I would take on these fools myself. It be my dream and don't care if it were the last thing I ever did after that. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Host: www.insideassyria.com User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 AskTbGAM1/3.9.1.14019 Firefox/3.6.13 ;Shoppe... Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Connection: close Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Hitchens_wont_admit_it-26Ii.7OQd.REPLY Cookie: *hidded* Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-length: 2505 |