Re: How Hillary Lied Her Way to a War With Libya |
Posted by
Marcello
(Guest)
- Friday, March 18 2016, 21:36:48 (UTC) from 71.107.52.71 - pool-71-107-52-71.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net Network - Windows NT - Safari Website: http://www.us.mg1.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.g)x=1&.rand Website title: Document Has Moved |
-- "The moment of truth came 11 days into the NATO bombing, which continued for several months, when Clinton’s top adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, who was not employed by the state department but by the private Clinton Foundation, laid out the reasons for the Washington-led intervention and the eventual ousting of Gadhafi. "Without once mentioning “humanitarian" purposes, in a March 27, 2011 email Blumenthal stressed to Clinton the importance of pressing for a “final win" by ousting Gadhafi in order to boost U.S. President Barack Obama’s then low approval ratings. "Ousting the Libyan strongman, argued Blumenthal, would further establish “security in North Africa, securing democracy in Egypt and Tunisia, economic development, effect throughout Arab world and Africa, extending U.S. influence, counter-balancing Iran, etc." "Further highlighting his complete and utter disregard for the human cost of the intervention, in the same email Blumenthal informed Clinton about the horrors committed by U.S.-backed forces in Libya, which included members of al-Qaida. "Speaking in strict confidence, one rebel commander stated that his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries in the fighting." Such actions are considered war crimes and in violation of international resolutions and conventions. "The emails also reveal that the Obama administration and Clinton were aware of the threat of al-Qaida in the eastern part of the country, which had for years been suppressed by the Libyan leader. "The emails also show that claims made by NATO at the time, including alleged atrocities committed by Gadhafi’s forces such as rape and mass killings, were rumors used by Clinton and the Obama administration to help sell the intervention to the world." http://www.telesurtv.net/english/analysis/How-Hillary-Clinton-Lied-Her-Way-to-War-in-Libya-20160318-0008.html It is clear the NATO intervention was not intended for humanitarian purposes. So what were the intentions of Clinton and the Obama administration? The same as most U.S. interventions: financial interest. This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following address: "http://www.telesurtv.net/english/analysis/How-Hillary-Clinton-Lied-Her-Way-to-War-in-Libya-20160318-0008.html". If you intend to use it, please cite the source and provide a link to the original article. www.teleSURtv.net/english --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Connection: close X-varnish: 1515158588 X-forwarded-for: 71.107.52.71 X-onecom-forwarded-proto: http X-onecom-forwarded-ip: 71.107.52.71 Cookie: *hidded* Accept-language: en-US,en;q=0.8 Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Four_Million_Muslims_Killed_in_US_NATO_Wars_Should_We_Call_It_Genocid... Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/49.0.2623.87 Safari/537.36 Upgrade-insecure-requests: 1 Origin: http://www.insideassyria.com Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8 Cache-control: max-age=0 Content-length: 2945 Host: www.insideassyria.com |