Re: OJ's Glove |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Sunday, July 31 2016, 19:30:53 (UTC) from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
...also, when asked how it could be that the blood on the OJ glove found behind his house, seven hours after the killing, was fresh and "wet"...when blood would be dry in that time if not sealed from the air....Furhman said he didn't know. And when asked if the only way blood could be kept that fresh is if the glove had been placed in a sealed plastic bag, Furhman said didn't think so...but that's the point; HOW did the blood remain fresh so long after being exposed? If not that it was sealed and taken to OJ's house to be planted there. In this documentary is also the first time I had seen the actual crime scene with the blood all over the place...necks had been severed...blood had gushed out everywhere....how could anyone have caused all of that and not had been found, that day, without a single drop of blood? But wait, blood WAS found...a drop here and a drop there, very like someone had had let fell one drop.....maybe from that vial of OJ's blood the cops had in their cars for a week. And another thing...when murderers clean up themselves or a crime scene to get rid of blood, they also get rid of every other stain, dirt, bacteria, and anything else which normally occurs in nature...in fact that is one sure way cops know someone cleaned up a crime scene..it is TOO clean. No mention was made of OJ's house or car or his body being "too" clean. A guilty person, especially one who didn't plan his crime but acted out of rage and passion, as they claimed OJ did, isn't eager to speak to police, especially not before he speaks to his lawyer or lawyers, and under no circumstances would he speak to them alone, without a lawyer present....even innocent people know enough to have a lawyer with them just so they don't get tricked by cops. OJ was in Chicago when the police called with the news and he agreed to fly back immediately and met with them as soon as he got off the plane...even as an innocent man that was unwise...but if guilty? He could easily have put the police off and just as easily had his lawyers present.....if he was that "dumb" then how did he manage to "get away with it"? The answer to both is that he didn't do it. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
*** |