The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5
=> Re: Pondering Land Ownership
| Re: Pondering Land Ownership |
|
Posted by
Marcello
(Guest)
- Monday, November 28 2011, 0:25:57 (UTC) from 71.107.57.119 - pool-71-107-57-119.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net  Network -  Windows XP -  Internet ExplorerWebsite: http://us.mg1.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand Website title: Redirect |
the US's program to set up a outpost in the Mid-East to police the new untermenschen (Arabs) and subjugate them to the will of Western Imperialists, so that they could control the world's enegy resources indefinitely "And that can be achieved by sending Jews to colonize a small chunk of the Levant? So without Israel the US cannot control the Gulf oil? Maybe you mean that the creation of Israel has given the western backed Arab dictators the justification to subjugate their people. That could be true." - A small chunk of the Levant with over 200 nuclear weapons is enough to control the whole eastern hemisphere, if not more. And the Arab leaders were not elected by the Arab people, and they are as guilty as their overseers. But it's Sunday, so I'll accept your argument, Mr. Beckett. Occupied Indian land So a land belongs to the people who first arrived and lived in it? What if they had never stepped foot in many areas like Iowa or North Dakota? How do we determine which is their land and which is not? What makes the entire United States, or North America “their” land? How many Natives were there when the European settlers came and where were they dispersed and concentrated? According to the National Geographic, uncontacted tribes have been recently discovered in the Amazon. Should we negotiate boarder disputes with them? - I live in Los Angeles, California. I was referring to my state, which had numerous Indian tribes, who first came into contact with the Spanish, then the Yanks stole these lands from Mexico, for many reasons, but the main cause in California was the "Gold Rush of 1849". In short, they got fucked from the South and the East. And North Dakota has one of the biggest tribes, the Lakota Indians, living there still in decrepit reservations, and they've been fighting a legal battle against mining companies who want to displace them to get their grubby hands on the available resources there. And, where there are Indian reservations, there are high rates of cancer, due to toxic waste dumping in the rivers. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
|
Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/x-mfe-ipt, application/x-ms-... Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_Pondering_Land_Ownership-PYet.8DJM.REPLY Accept-language: en-us User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR ... Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Host: www.insideassyria.com Content-length: 2473 Connection: close Cache-control: no-cache Cookie: *hidded* |
- Sunday, November 27 2011, 2:51:44 (UTC)
- 11/27 06:55
Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9