The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: Rick "the Dick" Santorum

Re: Rick "the Dick" Santorum
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Wednesday, January 4 2012, 17:23:40 (UTC)
from *** - *** Commercial - Windows XP - Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

>
> "We have laws in states, like the one at the Supreme Court right now, that [have] sodomy laws and they were there for a purpose. Because, again, I would argue, they undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family.

...as one raging queen once said on an old talk show, "honey, we dont do anything YOU don;t do". Sodomy is popular with everyone...always has been and always will be....so get over it.


And if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy,

...no. Since straight people have the right to consensual sex, Gay people feel they have the same right...it's a civil rights issue, not a sex issue. Bigamy is already illegal, for straight people....so there's no basis for saying Gay sex will lead to illegal sex....illegal sex is illegal...we're talking about rights already granted straight people....Gay people are people too, they deserve the same rights as straight people.

you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything.

...you already have the legal right to adultery, straight people made that happen...incest and polygamy and robbery and murder are already illegal...Gay people aren't asking us to make illegal things legal...they are asking that we don;t make things that are legal for straight people all of a sudden ONLY for straight people.


Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does.

...your type of homophobia leads to murder and abuse...those are far more dangerous to our society than fucking.


It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold – Griswold was the contraceptive case – and abortion. And now we’re just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you – this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family. You say, well, it’s my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that’s antithetical to strong, healthy families.

...it has nothing to do with families...you people can only make these arguments in the media and among yourselves...when you try them in courts of law you lose every time because there the issues are RIGHTS, legal RIGHTS and equality of RIGHTS...whatever straight people can do, Gay people can do...whatever white people can do, Black and Latino and Asian people can do...it's that simple. Gay people are not asking to be able to do things that are illegal for whites, or straight people...it's a matter of equal rights...I don;t know how "privacy" got in to it....it's a matter of legal and equal RIGHTS.


Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, where it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family."

...sodomy never hurt anyone...who was willing. Polygamy is already illegal...adultery is open to all and not illegal...if anyone has hurt families it is homophobes like this dweeb.
>
>Sound familiar?



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9