The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: To Assyrian Muslim and Pancho

Re: To Assyrian Muslim and Pancho
Posted by AssyrianMuslim (Guest) - Monday, October 22 2007, 9:10:06 (CEST)
from 208.102.129.185 - FL-ESR1-208-102-129-185.fuse.net Network - Windows 2000 - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

Do you know what the problem with these people is Pancho? as you said, they read books only written by people of their mentality. Books written by people like Aprim and they listen to their institutions, their priests, shamashas. They rather listen to that and call others ignorant. I use to listen to those types too, and I nearly killed Muslims because of such ifnorance. Its nonsense. Whenever someone does real research from real sources and not some self made authors filled with prejudices, they will know the truth. But it is not always easy to do that since the truth hurts. I have seen how they'll deny the Syrianis from calling themselves "Aramean, or the Chaldeans from saying Chaldean, but only want to be the right ones. Trying to fabricate books by some priests is not going to cut it. Trying to Assyrianize everything by adding an "A" to everything is not going to work. I have heard it throughout my life that the language we speak being referred to as "Assyrian" but that is just one of those examples. If a Chaldean can't say he speaks Chaldean, how can an Assyrian say the same, do we speak Akkadian today? yet they claim Jesus spoke Assyrian lol. There is a difference between speaking Aramaic and speaking Assyrian. Thats like a Mexican telling a Cuban that he speaks Mexican, but Cubans speak Spanish. Trying to Assyrianize everything is not going to cut it.

If one is intelligent enough to figure out that the westerners revived the "Chaldean" then why is the same denied when there is strong evidence to support the claim made by many historians that "Assyrian" was only adopted after 1915. It's strange that our ancastors had forgotten their name and their ancastry that suddenly the British had to remind them that they were Assyrian, but they just forgot the "A" and were calling themselves "Suraye". Today the theory can be supported better than ever since one has to be Christian and nesorian or else one is no longer "Aturaya". Isin't that strange that one loses his/her identity if one rejects not only a religion, but even if one leaves the church. I have met many Shites from Hila (Babylon) and everyone that I have met so far claims to be Babylonian, and what does that mean for them since they are Shiites I wonder. Or the Mahlamis of Turkey who to this day call themselves Ashuri, but Christians deny them since they are not Christian. As if one has to be Christian in order to remain something. It's sad, but true at the same time that this "Assyrian name is hijacked and being used by Christians as a cover up, and many are aware of this trick. Whenever someone mentions this facts or anything you mentioned, they attack, insult and get pissed. I know many Assyrians who were banned from so many Assyrian forums for simplly just making sense and were hard to refute.



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 3126
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_To_Assyrian_Muslim_and_Pancho-BIap.2XZg.REPLY
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9