Re: a little courage doesn't go very far... |
Posted by
Marcello
(Guest)
- Wednesday, November 13 2013, 19:57:54 (UTC) from 71.107.52.17 - pool-71-107-52-17.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net Network - Windows XP - Safari Website: http://us.mg1.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand Website title: Redirect |
These kidnappings do happen, but at what rate and why? Is it because of the Hindu military occupation of Muslim Kashmir? Is it the divisions manipulated long ago by Western imperialists, as in the occupation and exploitation of India by the British Empire, and the destruction of a viable and independent Indian economy, i.e., Indian textiles, and the social fabric within which Hindu, Muslim and Sikh once lived more or less in better harmony than they did prior to outside meddling? Or are there cases in which the girls run away from their home and marry Muslim men (as fools for love, other times with open eyes and willfully) only referred to as "kidnappings" by the parents and the family of the girls to not be seen as dishonorable in the eyes of their community, just as Assyrians call each case of an Assyrian girl marrying a Muslim as "forced conversion"? But let's stay with the kidnappings, as in Muslim men forcibly abducting Hindu girls -- is this comparable to Hindu soldiers raping Muslim girls in front of their fathers and brothers in Kashmir? How about the peaceful Buddhist fascists in Myanmar (Burma) and the rate of death, rape and perpetrated massacres against the Muslim Rohingya -- rapes and murders sanctioned and sanctified by Buddhist monks? And who owns the BBC, known during the Iraq war as the "Bush and Blair Corporation"? Will they report more about Muslim crimes against Christians, Hindus and Buddhists, or the other way around? And who helped light the tinder box that exploded into the nightmare of Muslim on Muslim crimes, or Muslim vs non-Muslim crimes? Was it not outside forces who used the Muslim Brotherhood to destroy Nasser's Arab Nationalism or the rise of secular humanism and Marxism in the Middle East, as in the right-wing Mujahedeen in Afghanistan, or the export of Wahhabi and Salafi religious gangster ideology from Arabia to annihilate more moderate aspects of Islam, as in the destruction of the Sufi or the Alewite? Cui Bono? And why get hung up on the effects without exploring the various causes? When a tree is about to fall down and smash up your house, do you prune the branches, or do you cut down the tree down from its roots? (By the way, I love trees.) What are the root causes of these acts? And again, Cui Bono? Who does it ultimately benefit? Muslims? Hindus? Buddhists? Or perhaps someone else with a long history of Machiavellian divide and rule strategy? It's to simplistic to just post one or many incidents without delving into the historical causes of these effects. That's where real historians come into the picture. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Host: www.insideassyria.com Content-length: 2996 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8 Origin: http://www.insideassyria.com User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_a_little_courage_doesn_t_go_very_far-CPkl.19cd.REPLY Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-language: en-US,en;q=0.8 Cookie: *hidded* X-onecom-forwarded-ip: 71.107.52.17 X-forwarded-for: 71.107.52.17 X-varnish: 514628383 Connection: close |