Re: dealing in "good faith" |
Posted by
AssyrianMuslim
(Guest)
- Friday, May 23 2008, 6:59:21 (CEST) from 75.219.224.96 - 96.sub-75-219-224.myvzw.com Commercial - Windows Codename Longhorn - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
Yeah it is not new for them to even deny truth in order to win an arguement. I tell you a perfect example. My young brother who is not even 20 years old, was born and raised in church and has solid understanding of how things work with the religion. He no longer goes to church and a short while back he had deep discussion with his youth minister about "salvation". The only way to truly be redeemed from the "original sin" is by the sacrifice of Jesus. There is no "salvation" without it or else the sacrifice would be pointless. The pastor was just talking about that no matter how good one strives to be, how sincere a person is, no matter how much prayer, fasting generosity, charity, etc it will not do any good because there is no "salvation" without the "blood of Christ". Later on during the debate between my brother and the youth minister, the individual had to deny all that in an attempt to at least save face and win the arguement. My brother humiliated him and told him "you can take your hard cover porno book along with your paganized beliefs and shove em". Now they are pissed because they lost another sheep which means one less "10%". So the point I am trying to make is that they'll even lie in order to prevail with their agenda. So if one has to go as far as denying a solid fact, they'll do that when it is useful and we can see this Minime doing it. For almost 2,000 years the world of Christendom has been doing this ritual and holding it extremely important yet suddenly they are all wrong and Minime has it all right. There are only 2 choices in this case. Either the 2 billion Christians got it all wrong or Minime is the liar and so desperate that he'll go as far as denying a solid fact in order to prove a dumb AssyrianMuslim and Pancho wrong. He can never prove us wrong because it is his religion which teaches so, they get it straight from the Gospels and the world of Christendom has been doing this ever since it was made official. Instead of taking his rage out on us he should go resolve it with his church. There is nothing to misunderstand about it. Jesus is not around today so obviously they can't butcher him and eat him, therefore, the bread and wine is to be the "body of Christ". We freaking know that it is only bread and wine but that is not so to the church, and it is meant to be the body of Christ which makes it a form of cannibalism, not to mention pagan ritual. It is a shame that such a falsehood was ever thrown into the the mouth of the poor Jew but it is there and Christians claim the Bible to be the "word of God". So Minime can take his rage out on his own religion and its members instead of trying to start a holy war with us Non-Christians who are only telling the truth about the eucharist. It must be that embarrassing and obvious that some are willing to change it after almost 2,000 years and go against the teaching and understanding of Christendom. I have seen absolutely pathedic people but one who is even in denial of such a solid fact and basic knowledge has serious mental problems. Is he not the one who is forever saying "pancho, go get a psychologist" yet he has a hard time with this? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 3485 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-application, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument, appli... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?dealing_in_good_faith-HMjm.QWbi.REPLY Ua-cpu: x86 User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506) |