The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: hypocrisy 101

Re: hypocrisy 101
Posted by Rashad (Guest) - Monday, November 8 2010, 6:37:56 (UTC)
from 74.136.110.155 - 74-136-110-155.dhcp.insightbb.com Commercial - Linux - Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

Christians have fabricated and forged statements to prove their genocide against Armenians but everyone now knows it was bogus. Iraqis, however, didn't have to forge anything because we have it straight from the horse's mouth and they admit that the Iraqi people were the target. Iraq has a huge population of young people and that was part of the reason why it had the fourth largest army in the world at one point. Majority of Iraqis were and are of young age and the ones who most suffered from the sanctions were young ones. While they can't even prove Muslims committed a genocide 100 years ago, Christians have managed to carry out another one and not to mention the holocaust barely 60 years ago.

As for killing women, there is no doubt that it is unacceptable but what did Christians under the church do to free women who married a slave? Their punishment was execution by public burning. This is not for murder, or any crime but just for a free woman who would want to marry a slave. Where in Islamic history can we find anything this crazy? A slave in Islamic history could not only marry but inherited, owned property, business and many of the amirs, sultans and scholars were former slaves who rose to higher ranks.

America tells us that women in Afghanistan needed liberation but does any sane person actually believe this war was to free women? Spending billions in order to free women who are supposedly oppressed? I don't buy that and I am familiar with Afghanistan. I should briefly talk about this country. During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, America backed the Mujahideen who are the same people who became known as the Taliban. These ancient warriors are not friendly to occupations as history shows that. The Mujahideen sent the Soviets running out of Afghanistan. After the war, Afghanistan was destroyed and America betrayed the people. Warlords were fighting one another and heroin/opium was big money for them. In 1996, Taliban managed to take over Afghanistan and bring stability and peace to the country which was lacking for over 25 years. The Taliban started burning and destroying the drugs and America has interests in this part of the world so they went after Taliban and made them look many times worse than they were.

We are shown images of Pashtun men with bears who seem frightening to the average whitey but that whitey doesn't remember that these were the same people Regan called "America's heroes" and "freedom fighters". One may hate the Taliban for some things but one thing can be said of them. These people are not greedy nor care for money. They straight up destroyed the drugs there and America jumped in. The area is of interest to the few top guys that run the world. This war was not over Afghan women but they were used as an excuse to get naive Americans to support the mission just as they supported the the silly cold war when in reality it was nothing more than a game. We, Americans, are still paying the interest for the money borrowed by our government from the Federal Reserve and the same central bank also financed Hitler, Communists and others. Imagine that. We are paying the taxes which pay the loans from the Bank that our silly government borrows from.

It isn't ironic that the FBI, IRS and ADL were all established in 1913, which was right after the President gave that authority to the world bankers. There is much more involved here and this has nothing to do with women. They mean to tell me they care for darker women in other countries when America is the leader in domestic violence, rape and sexual harassment? They actually went to Iraq to free the people from Saddam whom they brought to power and supported until they both used one another? Iraq was no threat to America except that maybe Saddam wasn't cooperative with them any more and he supported Palestinians just as Christians finance the Zionist state. Christians tell me that "they have been fighting there forever" but that is bullshit. There was no fighting between Palestinians and Jews prior to 1948. The Palestinians are not greedy nor fighting them because they are Jews but they are being occupied and Obama, may have shot himself in the foot when he on accident or perhaps intentionally used the word "occupation" but he was correct.

It is what it is. Beyamin Netanyahu ones said that Israelis were not occupiers but indigenous and at "home" but he is only fooling himself. These "Israelis" are European and all migrated there after 1948. There were about a half million Jews in Palestine prior but these are the same people the pale skinned Euro Jews reject. Being Jewish doesn't make one indigenous to Israel but that is how it works for those who live by the Bible. It is these same people who are a danger to the world but they fail to see it and instead want to convince us that bearded men in Afghanistan or wherever else in the east are our threat.



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 5247
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Keep-alive: 300
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_hypocrisy_101-6Ffz.68gr.REPLY
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100106 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Firefox/3.5.7



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9