Re: more propaganda |
Posted by
Rashad
(Guest)
- Saturday, May 7 2011, 4:52:35 (UTC) from 74.136.110.21 - 74-136-110-21.dhcp.insightbb.com Commercial - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
Also it took them a long time to release a "video" to prove what happened really took place and even that didn't show a plane. There is just too much that don't add up and then they wanna call those who question "crazy". Calling names won't explain anything and one can see how uncomfortable O'reily or Hannity or any of those assholes get when trying to explain it. I remember when Jesse Ventura got on FOX and asked Hannity why they get so mad when 9/11 is questioned and they kept changing the subject by asking him if he's running for president. They don't wanna talk about it because they can't give an honest answer. This entire thing is build on lies and propaganda. If this is all true, that means it's the first time ever where buildings came down so easily from just the fuel. It was just too convenient for Bush and this happen at the perfect time when he was making his case against Iraq. The only reason they "got" Bin Laden now is for the same convenience. Do they mean to tell me it was this hard to get him all these years that it took Obama to do it? This is politics and each of the two presidents have something they put on their resume. One got Saddam and the other got Bin Laden. How convenient it all played out. How come nothing has ever happened here since those attacks? Do they mean to convince us that security is so good now that nothing can happen. One can see that this is all bullshit or else they wouldn't have to entrap people to make it look like there are Muslims out to get us. If they knew that killing Bin Laden would be so dangerous, they wouldn't take such a risk. If Iraq was such a huge threat, there wouldn't be an invasion because they would be afraid of retaliation. That is why America played it smart with the Soviet Union and never actually went to war because they knew what would happen. The two giants would have destroyed each other so they weren't stupid. I don't see how educated people can fall for this and actually believe it was essential to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, kill so many people, spent so much money and just to only make things more dangerous and more expensive. I can't see how a Hitchens or Harris can believe this and agree with it and that's why I can't help but view them as racists and they are totally illogical. A people pride themselves with logic yet behave the opposite. An atheist condemns religion for committing so much violence and then turns around and supports Christians of the same color and race to kill people who are different. Are all human lives important or only some. Is violence really bad as atheists say it is or is just an excuse? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Host: www.insideassyria.com User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 AskTbGAM1/3.11.3.15590 Firefox/3.6.17 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Connection: close Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_more_propaganda-Idqt.0IQu.REPLY Cookie: *hidded* Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-length: 2912 |