The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: okay Arrow

Re: okay Arrow
Posted by Marcello (Guest) - Friday, November 11 2011, 22:35:59 (UTC)
from 71.107.57.119 - pool-71-107-57-119.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website: http://us.mg1.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand
Website title: Redirect

Arrow jaan,

'The three males were not arrested nor were they allowed their constitutional right to Due-Process to contest the allegations waged against them in a court of law.'

"Usually the court summons the defendants for a trial but if they failed to appear then they will be tried in absentia. That didn't happen with those three?"

- It is unconstitutional to assassinate a citizen, just as it's against International law to murder a head of state or a foreign national. The US is setting the wrong precedent that will come back and bite it on its own ass.

'Is not extrajudicial executions of US citizens for reasons of anti-American rhetoric not an extreme, unlawful act of quelling dissent or muting an Amrican-born citizen's constitutional right to Freedom of Speech?'

"Is that really why they assassinated Al-Awlaki? To mute freedom of speech? Is the US government currently on a crack down on all those who are criticize it?"

- The US has a long history of targeting certain groups, vilifying them, and "neutralizing" them. This is all well documented. We can reach back to minority groups (whose militancy is a reaction to decades of state sponsored murder and terrorism), to anarchists during WWI (i.e., the execution of Sacco and Vanzetti), to the communinsts and labor groups (the execution the Rosenbergs), to Civil Rights and anti-war groups,.. when it's the season to demonize and prop up the new bogeyman, the US will use all tools of propaganda, disimformation, sabotage, murder, etc., and one day there will be no right to speech, to a free press, to assembly, for anyone. And, yes, the US did just that, mute Al-Awlaki.

Do you really wish for an environment where your constitutional right to Free Speech as a citizen of a democracy may be unlawfully and exrtremely curtailed, and your words construed as means for your unconstitutional murder? Without any legal possibilities to challenge allegations leveled against you? I think you're much too open-minded, and hopefully free-spirited, to want to live in a repressive and regressive atmosphere of that nature.

I am finding it very difficult to believe that this is the case. There are people all over the United States publicly and vehemently criticizing its domestic and foreign policies and their voices are widely heard.

I do not think those three American citizens were assassinated for what they said but rather for their active involvement in terrorist activities. To prove it, however, I cannot.

Regards :)

- The whole point is habeas corpus.. you cannot prove it.

ciao!



---------------------


The full topic:



Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/x-mfe-ipt, application/x-ms-...
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_okay_Arrow-0Siu.8Jbg.REPLY
Accept-language: en-us
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR ...
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Content-length: 3064
Connection: close
Cache-control: no-cache
Cookie: *hidded*



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9