Re: okay, okay... |
Posted by
AssyrianMuslim
(Guest)
- Tuesday, October 30 2007, 1:39:45 (CET) from 208.102.129.185 - FL-ESR1-208-102-129-185.fuse.net Network - Windows 2000 - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
Aramaic is not a dialect of Akkadian at all. They are Semitic languages just as Hebrew, Arabic, Ethiopic etc, but they are not other dialects. Or else we can say it is just another dialect of Arabic, but of course they wouldn't like that. However, Arabic is much closer to the Akkadian language than our current version of Aramaic is. To say Aramaic and Akkadian were same but just different dialects is totally false, but the languages are distinct and the only thing they have in common is that they are Semitic languages. In that case, they be no different from the rest of the Semitic languages, they belong to one family of languages but they are not just different dialects. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 906 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?okay_okay-07HN.JzTk.REPLY User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1) |