The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5
=> Re: where are your fucking sources???
| Re: where are your fucking sources??? |
|
Posted by
Rashad
(Guest)
- Friday, April 27 2012, 23:11:15 (UTC) from 74.82.68.33 - 74-82-68-33.rdns.blackberry.net  Network - -  Website: Website title: |
At this point he knows what kind of person he's dealing with and it be suicidal for him to mention his sources. It's that shit written by amateurs on aina, nineveh and the books authored by self-proclaimed historians. So he knows better not to mention any names or links. This is the same stuff all the heroes bring and have brought in the past on here when trying to refute us. Then they always ask why so and so can't be taken serious, and that's because that so and so has no business writing about something he or she is not familiar with. That's why we have experts in every field. We don't go to a janitor to learn about law so why go to aprim for history on modern assyrians and middle east? If they wanted to know so bad.n were interested and wanted to write about history, they could have pursued a career in that particular field that they write about, but they know it's a different ball game when it comes to that. History is not on their side and they won't find anything in their favor and that's why they became everything but historians and that's why they have to get the opinions of pastors, missionaries and any amateur to support their lies. Any white person they can find who writes a paragraph about them is their source and it strokes them and they think that's enough. At the end of the day it is for historians to tell us about a particular story and not some amateur who just adds his opinion. Joseph hasn't written about the ancient persians or egyptians because that's not his field so how can frye or parpola write about the nestorians and the middle east when that's not their field? That's apples and oranges they are mixing together and this amateur on wiki wants to tell us that joseph is wrong and all he needs is hiw own views and the fact that he speaks surith from birth. That's a joke. Even the most educated among them seem lost when it comes to that and they ask why is joseph's work taken so highly and above others, and that's because this is his field and he has made a career of it, and is well respected by other historians. Is that so hard to understand? Why don't world libraries and scholars turn to aprim when they wanna know about modern assyrians? Why don't they use wikipedia for their info? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
|
Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Content-length: 2536 User-agent: BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.654 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/389 Accept-language: en-US,en;q=0.5 X-wap-profile: "http://www.blackberry.net/go/mobile/profiles/uaprof/8530_evdo/5.0.0.rdf" Accept-charset: UTF-8,ISO-8859-1,US-ASCII,windows-1252,ISO-2022-JP,KSC5601,EUC-JP,EUC-KR,windows-1250,GB2312,UTF-16BE,Big5,Big5-HKSCS,x-... Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?where_are_your_fucking_sources-LRdx.KSTv.REPLY Via: BISB_3.5.1.90 Accept: application/vnd.rim.html,text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml,text/vnd.sun.j2me.app-descriptor,... Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Profile: http://www.blackberry.net/go/mobile/profiles/uaprof/8530_evdo/5.0.0.rdf Cache-control: max-age=0 Connection: close |
- Friday, April 27 2012, 16:26:50 (UTC)
Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9