Re: why hasn't Fidel Castro |
Posted by
Rashad
(Guest)
- Monday, May 9 2011, 1:38:42 (UTC) from 74.136.110.21 - 74-136-110-21.dhcp.insightbb.com Commercial - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
I compare those kind of Cubans to our Iraqis who do the same thing. They committed crimes in Iraq, many of them left before Saddam, yet they still blame him for it. Jalal Talabani, whom the Americans made president, was a thug and the leader of a terrorist group. I bet no American knows that since they are dumb but the US replaced one guy whom they called bad and replaced him with another who is definitely not god. Iraq is over 80 % Arab and I highly doubt that they would have voted for a Kurd as their president. Cubans in Florida are known for cocaine, mafia, crime, etc. That may not be what they truly are and not all of them but that is the image they have. The decent ones work like slaves for what they have while Cubans back home live happy, have good health, education and do not worry weather they'll have rent money next month or not. One fool on youtube was talking about how great Cuba was before Castro, and went on to talk about how it was popular for rich Americans and all that. Of course he young so he obviously didn't live in those days but heard it from others who may have been among the minority which had it good and benefited from the old dictator, aka uncle Sam boy. Under Castro, All Cubans have access to the good things and can enjoy what the nation has to offer. Americans are mad because Cuba use to be a good place for them to go and eat steak, sleep in hotels, fuck and do all kinds of things while the population was poor, uneducated and lacked basic things like running water and electricity. It is those who benefited from the previous corruption who are anti-Communist and are wishing for the fall of Castro because they can't currently go home and get rich on the expense of the rest. That's life in a capitalistic society where making money is a religion and nothing else matters. It's the opposite under communism and people don't work to get rich or because they need to eat but they work for social reasons. Humanity comes first and money after. But here it's money that comes first and then followed by more money and humans are irrelevant. That is why it puzzles me when Christians stand on street corners bitching about abortion(as if they care for human life) yet they don't complain when living persons are killed, hungry or on the streets. what a hypocrisy and that's exactly what religion is. All talk and no action at all. May sound good on paper that someone above the skies actually cares about you and wants to take care of sick people or poor people but it's all bullshit and useless. Why would religious people who claim all are equal under god be so against communism when that's exactly what it is? They don't want equality and those religions don't call for it at all. There is a difference between saying help the poor and be equal with everyone on a middle path. Religious people try to justify their own corrupt asses by saying that humans are by nature greedy and want more than others. This is not true and one can see that when other cultures are visited where capitalism isn't big or known. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Host: www.insideassyria.com User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 AskTbGAM1/3.11.3.15590 Firefox/3.6.17 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Connection: close Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_why_hasn_t_Fidel_Castro-SUlz.NZlx.REPLY Cookie: *hidded* Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-length: 3393 |