Re: yes but.... |
Posted by
Tiglath
(Guest)
- Thursday, August 12 2010, 14:43:18 (UTC) from 123.2.151.230 - 123-2-151-230.static.dsl.dodo.com.au Australia - Windows NT - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
....so long as the world also learns anew how to value paper money....and never again to say "we donīt have the money for health care...or potholes...or schools. Money is JUST paper with no intrinsic value at all....but my need for a piece of bread and my willingness to work to produce it, or the paper I get in exchange for the work I do, is a constant and will never change...so long as there is wheat and people. Maybe private individuals can go on borrowing from bankers but governments and countires have to stop...the people are enslaving themselves and impoverishing THEMSELVES. ### But does this not lead to the inevitable conclusion that there should be no trading at all? Doesn't trading boost productivity overall and ensure that efficiencies are maxmised? I mean unless a country is totally self sufficient and does not require trade they are all dependent on trading their surpluses with other nations. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 1150 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/jpeg, application/x-ms-application, image/gif, application/xaml+xml, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-xbap, applicati... Accept-language: en-AU Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Pragma: no-cache Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_yes_but-PRah.48ms.REPLY User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; FunWebProducts; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.... |