The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex

The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex
Posted by Marcello (Guest) georgiomalik@yahoo.com - Tuesday, January 4 2011, 8:56:16 (UTC)
from 71.104.223.183 - pool-71-104-223-183.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website: http://us.mg1.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand
Website title: Redirect

The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex
50 Years Since Ike's Warning
by Harry Targ Jan. 3,2011


"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and
a large arms industry is new in the American experience...

In councils of government, we must guard against the
acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought
or unsought, by the military/industrial complex. The
potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power
exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination
endanger our liberties or democratic processes...."

(Dwight D. Eisenhower, Jan. 17, 1961, farewell address.)


We have become so drugged by politicians that we often fail to reflect on the power of their words. Seeing books on library shelves with titles like "Speeches of Great Americans" culls up in our minds Readers Digest, the History Channel, Sunday morning sermons, and all the hyperbole that passed for political discourse in the 21st century. Every once in a while though, a politician says something that is rich with theoretical insight and inspiration and begs for action.

When President Eisenhower gave his final address to the nation on Jan. 17, 1961, 50 years ago, he warned of the "acquisition of unwarranted influence" of a military/industrial complex. He originally included the word "academic" but later eliminated it, for reasons of length. He was altering Americans to the breadth and scope of military power over the world and American society.

Ther President's words constituted a shocking challenge to the soon-to-be Kennedy era defense intellectuals who criticized the outgoin president's reluctance to spend more than the $40 billion he invested on the military. Even Eisenhower's direct orders to subordinates to overthrow Iran's Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953 and Guatemala's Jacobo Arbenz in 1954 and his declaration of the Middle East as a free-world sancuary was not interventionist enough for the 1960s theorists and practitioners of "modernization," "development," and "democracy."

Although Eisenhower warned us about the military/industrial complex he could not forsee the dramatic impacts of America's drive toward empire on foreign policy and public life.

He only dimly saw the changes that would occur in the techniques of empire. The expansion of the use of CIA money and American intelligence and military forces engineered the creation of brutal military coups. Military advisors revamped armies and repressive police forces in countries threatened by revolutionary change. In the 1980s in the face of an increasingly skeptical public, the United States used "low intensity conflict," that is, covert operatives, to train anti-government reactionaries to fight against regimes out of favor in places such as Nicaragua, Angola, Ethiopia, and Afghanistan. And then to mollify domestic critics, the US initiated the privitization and outsourcing of the military as an adjunct to the more than 700 US military bases in more than 40 countries that exist today. Most recently, high tech weapons, including unmanned but armed aerial vehicles, are used to kill people without endangering US soldiers. Technological advances and the globalization of US violence continue.

Eisenhower was unalterably opposed to the militarization of the US economy. While he was willing to allot $40 billion in 1950s currency, he resisted the demands from Beltway liberals and defense contractors to double military spending. By the 1960s, half of the federal budget began to go to the military and one in ten workers derived wages from defense contracts. And that continues, but with less public criticism.

Finally, Eisenhower spoke to the militarization of American culture. The university became a research arm of the complex. Students were taught about the virtues of military "readiness," the threat of "commmunism," the problem of "human nature" leads to perpetual war, and, more recently, the endless danger of "terrorism." Virtually every large corporation, producing such products as toothpaste, toys, breakfast cereal, medications, automobiles, electronics, or energy, is steeped in military contracts. The public airwaves, the Internet, movies, and sports are laced with war, violence, killing, and competition. As Eisenhower put it: "Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved: so is the very structure of society."

What another great American, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., said in reference to the military/industrial complex and the Vietnam War seven years after President Eisenhower's dramatic statement still holds today:

"Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now.
I speak for those whose land is being laid waste,
whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is
being subverted. I speak for the poor of America
who are paying the double price of smashed hopes
at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak
as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands
aghast at the path we have taken."

(Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., April 4, 1967.)


Harry Targ writes historical analysis and is the author of
"Challenging Capitalism, Neoliberal Globalization, & Militarism"



---------------------


The full topic:
No replies.


Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.bgjm.
Accept-language: en-us
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; yie8)
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Content-length: 5936
Connection: close
Cache-control: no-cache
Cookie: *hidded*



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9