justifiable retaliation.... |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Sunday, April 3 2016, 19:23:54 (UTC) from *** - *** Commercial - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
...when Japan attacked the United States what did they expect in return? That Americans wouldn't fight back....and wind up dropping atom bombs on women and children too....? When Germany attacked Poland and then everybody else, what did they expect in return? Were they as "shocked" as we appear to be that anybody, Iraqi or Afghani, lifted a finger against us after we massacred their people and devastated their countries? ...with all the advanced weaponry Hitler and the United States have and had at their disposal they STILL chose to bomb civilian targets...are we to believe that a formal army NEVER commits terror...or a State? Who made that definition? ..if Iraq was as dense in jungle growth as Vietnam was I have no doubt Iraqis would have preferred to remain in their country and hide and attack US soldiers as the Vietnamese did...but Iraq and the rest of the countries in the MidEast are barren desert with nowhere to hide and no tunnels worth digging...so, what are the Iraqis to do....roll over and die? Who has EVER done that? ..of course we knew what we were doing, never mind all the "mistakes were made"...we KNEW they would strike at us as best they could and most of all against civilian targets...as we starved to death hundreds of thousands of their children...was that NOT an act of terror? Just contemplate watching your dear child slowly die of starvation and ask if the child and those parents were not Terrorized? We KNEW Iraqis and others would retaliate and that was the whole point...the neo-cons have got what they wanted; a population so terrified they can be manipulated with ease...that WAS the point...that and a whole lot of money from our Treasury and loans from China we will be paying for for a long long time to come. --------------------- |
The full topic: No replies. |
*** |