silly Jon Stewart |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Thursday, June 18 2015, 14:36:51 (UTC) from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
In the first month of WW I France lost over 200,000 Christians killed and wounded.....by the end of the war Britain had lost 950,000 dead young Christian men and boys. During those same years the only Muslims fighting anywhere were the Turks and at that they were fighting against Christians who wanted their oil same as today, and then only because the allies made it clear they wanted to dismember the Ottoman Empire and steal their oil rich Iraq. But the Germans, Belgians, Russians, Serbs, Austrians, Hungarians, French and British were all Christians...they all got their morality from the same bible..they all worshiped Jesus, the Prince of Peace....but it didn't stop them from murdering each other, Christian against Christian. Where and when have Sunni and Shia EVER done such things? When did Muslims field armies of one million men to attack other Muslims? The only time such a thing happened, and it was in the modern era, was when America decided it would be good for business to sell weapons to Iran and Iraq and encourage their then client, Saddam, to attack....and what a Christian bundle was made! But it barely whet the appetite for “private” wars...that's what it was: a private, “business” war, that and the ones that followed...right along there with privatized prisons, privatized health care and universities and schools (and Social Security, some day), these wars are nothing more than business....only we dummies who pay refuse to see it...because we simply can't imagine such a horror. And that's too bad because it wont stop...Ukraine looks like a good market, or rather the Euros who will start buying more of our weapons and the Saudis are stocking up.....all of it to “protect” their citizens. And the mother of them all China....business will be thriving for decades to come......unless the bottom falls out. Even Jon Stewart got into the act of decrying Sunni on Shia violence, which he said goes back centuries...it does...where? Where are these centuries of wars between Muslims documented? In what library? Is this Beth-Shlimon all over again? Stewart read from one history book which stated that a truce was declared between Sunni and Shia......in the tenth century. He let that lie there like it meant anything, by itself. He ended by saying, “Yeah in the TENTH CENTURY”! As to imply that back then was the only time Sunni and Shia DIDN”T fight each other, because there was no other mention of a TRUCE since then. But, he presented no evidence of any serious, or other, fights since then either. In four years alone, 1914-18 (not centuries) the British counted 908,000 British dead, 2,0990,00 wounded and 190,000 missing (which means dead but so mutilated as not possible to identify). And that's only the Brits. Why someone as bright as Stewart conclude that these two Muslim sects had been fighting since the 10th century and had, obviously(since he produced no other history book) never again “declared a truce”...because they MUST have been fighting since then, else where was another truce? Such illogic. If there had been no other truce, since the tenth century, then obviously, because Stewart produced no evidence of fighting since then, this is evidence that the truce must have LASTED all those centuries. He found no evidence of fighting between the two, but he DID find evidence of a truce six hundred years ago....and that led him to conclude they went back to fighting....but, when? He doesn't say...he doesn't produce one history book which lists all the wars between the two, as there are scores of such books on Christian on Christian wars.....he found no evidence of fighting so he just assumed there must have been...because, “you all know what Sunni and Shia are like”! Right? No, actually Americans barely know who Robert E. Lee was.....they know NOTHING about Sunni/Shia except what Fox, and now Stewart, tell them. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
*** |