the Armenian non-genocide..... |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Friday, April 24 2015, 19:47:04 (UTC) from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
It must gall Christians that the word "Genocide" was first coined to describe what Christians did to Jews in the Holocaust....and what about the millions of Native Americans murdered by European Christians...was this not a genocide? And in South America where Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguy and other countries have not a single native person left alive...was not the murder of all of those millions also genocide? And what of Africans.....hundreds of thousands of whom died before they ever arrived in the New World to be worked to death...wasn't the targeted killing of those Africans genocide? And what of the 700,000 murdered Iraqi babies, was that not a genocide too? These examples have one thing in common; they were genocides conducted by Christians. And now, desperate to smear Muslims with their crimes, Christians insist on calling what happened in Turkey when it was being attacked by, who else? CHRISTIANS, a genocide....but it wasn't. When you round up everyone and kill the entire group, no matter where they hide and how little "blood" of the hated group they may have, and when this policy is enunciated and taught by Church and politicians and when you set up an industrial base and factories and rail lines to murder members of one group, THAT is a genocide and the only ones to have done this are Christians. If you look at Euro Christian civilization you find ample evidence of pogroms and persecutions and mass murders of Jews...it had been going on for over 1000 years...the Holocaust was merely the culmination of centuries of Christian hatred, on an industrial scale...but it was nothing new to Euro culture, it was business as usual only on a new massive scale.....which is the exact opposite of the history of religious tolerance in Ottoman lands....for centuries, since their empire was first established, Ottoman Turkey was the ONE place, aside from Moorish Spain, where Muslims lived in harmony and peace with both Christians and Jews....of course they had conflicts but nothing like Christian had with Christian...if anything it was atypical for Turks to persecute anyone let alone round them up with the intent of killing them all. The Turks had every reason to suspect their Christian subjects, as every government has had when Christians were in the minority...they had good reason based on experience to distrust the loyalty of their Christian subjects...and the Armenians were importing weapons and killing Turks....so the government wanted to move all Christians inland, away from the borders...as a precaution in time of war...and it was in this move that thousands died, but hundreds of thousands of Turks were also dying from starvation and then disease...men were in the army fighting, there was hardly anyone to plant and harvest and there were no surpluses to speak of. To this date not a single valid, and not forged, document has been presented showing that it was the Ottoman government intention to round up and massacre Armenians or anyone else...not one. Politicians use this football to gain votes....and who needs to hear from politicians about genocides OR the weather? We need historians and scientists for that, not politicians....and of course the Christians would like nothing more than to "prove" that Muslims can be just as bad as Christians....well, Christians are demonstrably and historically WORSE...just to underline the point, who started this mess in the MidEast? --------------------- |
The full topic: No replies. |
*** |