watching toto undress himself... |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Tuesday, May 14 2013, 18:06:29 (UTC) from *** - *** Commercial - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
...they all do this. They all wind up kicking themselves in the head before any "enemy" has to, or even wants to. All you have to do to "defeat assyria" is let these guys talk where they can't be protected either by their mommies or moderators. They all, all, have only one line of defense, one "punch", after that they can only repeat themselves until they collapse. They have no second or third argument...they can't go any deeper into anything and usually stay on the surface...and you can see why. They have no depth to their arguments.,..they are without exception badly educated, near to illiterate and just plain ignorant of anything but their first-line argument. ..."we are assyrians", they tell us...and when you ask how they know that, they say, "because we are assyrians and we just KNOW". And that's it. You will get nothing more out of them...they have no evidence except "we know". And since they never challenged that statement themselves, they don't know what to say when challenged in their turn. Same with the slanders they make against Islam and Muslims and Arabs and Turks. "How do you know these things", we ask..."we just KNOW", they respond. Now toto and others have brought what they consider to be evidence in the form of agreeable grandmothers, religious writers printed by religious job-shops and a smattering of amateurs who find it easier to write on this subject than their own, because their audience is so undemanding, ignorant, and tickled by praise that no one raises the issue of actual expertise in THIS subject...which is why they love Parpola and Parpola loves THEM. It's a love affair based on mutual ignorance. There are two main questions we've been asking for some years of these assyrians, questions about what evidence they have for their lies about Islam. And, we have heard nothing back, except such flimsy stuff as no serious person could accept....but even then, even with the grandmothers and amateurs, even if we accept them, for the sake of argument...how come they can't find actual historians and professionals in THIS field to back them? We too can find lots of grandmothers to agree with us...but that is the least of it. We also manage to, easily, find historians and experts, recognized the world over as such, who agree with our grandmothers and amateurs...whereas ALL they have are grandmothers and amateurs. We say over and over that these guys defeat themselves, kick the legs out from under themselves...and we see the evidence yet again with toto's visit. We asked for hard evidence, he went off and came back with grandma and a Greek in Thrace and some more dismal "books" printed by a religious outfit. We said these were unacceptable, to which toto replied, "when I bring you evidence, you reject it, so what am I supposed to do"? The answer of course is that what he brought didn't meet any standard as "evidence" and what he can "do" is find some serious sources. But, in an effort to help him look even more ridiculous and to prove that with every step they take on what they think is the road to Nineveh, they are really slipping to Hell...we now tell Toto that we are willing to accept Granny...but, can he find any professionals in THIS field to back her up. Of course he hasn't been unable to, and we know he never will find such sources because they don't exist....and so we're back at where we started, except that toto is even more bare assed than he was before, when he thought he'd found something to toss back at us. We ACCEPT all of his amateurs and grannies...okay? BUT, we would like him to bring just ONE expert in THIS field, to back up Granny. And he can't. We're not rejecting Granny...we're just asking for a real historian to back her up. See what I mean? The more they try, they more they fail, and the worse too. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
*** |