what the fuck is WRONG with suicide attacks...? |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Sunday, February 20 2011, 12:44:59 (UTC) from *** - *** - Windows XP - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
...it's almost become natural to condemn suicide attacks...why? Because they SCARE white people? If so then don't do the kinds of things and bring them on! Just because when American soldiers murder civilians and children they run no risk, doesn't mean their tactic is correct...or to be applauded. If Muslims had a history of manufacturing weapons of death and destruction they too could fire rockets from afar...then what would be our complaint? That they dare fight AT ALL? To be supportive of suicide attacks is to be supportive of Colonel Dolittle's raid on Tokyo in WW II...it means you support acts of desperation when nothing else will do...and if there is serious risk to the attackers as well...you call them HEROES...as the United States has done several times. It was suicidal for the Colonists to take on the British Empire too. For goodness sake, the whole world knows that the United States targeted Iraqi children in its Sanctions...if the Sanctions had meant death for the Americans imposing them, would THAT have made them "suicide sanctions"? Just because no American died while starving to death children makes it somehow better than if the attacker had died in the attack? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
*** |