xactly |
Posted by
pancho
(Moderator)
- Tuesday, May 7 2013, 18:08:51 (UTC) from *** - *** Network - Windows NT - Mozilla Website: Website title: |
...scholar vs propagandist...that's Joseph vs Aprim and all the other taxi-scholars this nayshun produces. Joseph tells us that he took a specialized interest in our own history just because there was so much confusion, so many competing versions of how we were assyrian and chaldean and all that rot...so while getting his doctorate in Mid East history, he made a point of examing the historical record to trace the supposed descent of assyrians...and, of course, he found out just how it happened...and that we weren't directlyrealted to anything but idiots...witness Toro. I'm sure Joseph would have had no problem proving he was Chaldean or Assyrian....neither would I. But to insist we are in the face of the lack of evidence is, well, it's very "religious" and after all the entire notion that we are assyrian is about as solid as the existence of Jesus...if you believe in one, why not the toher...when both are merely matter of faith? In fact these people REVEL in the lack of evidence..to them their continued belief, in the face of no evidence, is even more proof of how right they must be...like, "would I believe it if it easn't true, when there is no evidence that it IS true"? ...this, is the competition...no wonder they lose everywhere. --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
*** |