Posted by farid from customer-148-233-78-77.uninet.net.mx (148.233.78.77) on Tuesday, June 10, 2003 at 12:28PM :
In Reply to: Clarification posted by D from 92.52.26.24.cfl.rr.com (24.26.52.92) on Tuesday, June 10, 2003 at 3:08AM :
I don't know where you got the idea I said guns were a solution to anything other than that, or that I approved of attacking other countries.
***Well what the hell DID you say? What difference would it have made if the Iraqi soldiers shot, or lay down their guns? What did the war in Vietnam achieve...what did the First and the Second World War achieve? You really think the worldīs problems have been solved or ameliorated by people shooting guns at each other?
Do you think killing Hitler...after first killing lots of Germans, saved anybody? Who did Hitler want to kill that he DIDNīT? Every killing machine takes a break...the Romans had periodic "time outs" as well. Hitler would have killed, like Bush did...till heīd killed all he needed to...taken a break...killed some more as needed, and called the times in between, "Peace".
The format has been well established...you kill all the people you want to...lie about it in the "history" books...enjoy what fruits come your way...die...and watch from Hebben as the children of those you killed rise up and kill your children.
Take the long view of murder. It doesnīt work...not the murder of Christ...not any murder. There are two victims at least every time someone is killed...the dead one and the one who killed him or her.
No...killing is no solution...we just enjoy it too much to ever let it go...not so long as there is a benefit attached as well..."kill Jesus...get into Heaven"...what could be plainer or more disgusting or encourage murder...and this is a religion of "love"...or Blood?
-- farid
-- signature .
Follow Ups: