it was intended for non-serious consideration....

Posted by D from 92.52.26.24.cfl.rr.com (24.26.52.92) on Monday, June 16, 2003 at 0:54AM :

In Reply to: Is THAT why we have 81,711 hits as of this second posted by Jeff from d14-69-62-196.try.wideopenwest.com (69.14.196.62) on Sunday, June 15, 2003 at 11:56PM :

In other words, I was kidding.

-- D
-- signature .

Follow Ups:

• Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration - The Cheeta Of Them All 2:23PM 06/16/2003 () (5)
  • Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration - D 3:05PM 06/16/2003 () (4)
    • Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration - farid 4:16PM 06/16/2003 () (3)
      • Re: it was intended for non-serious consideration - D 6:08PM 06/16/2003 () (2)
        • Well Here... - farid 11:59AM 06/17/2003 () (1)
          • Woohoo! - D 1:03PM 06/17/2003 () (0)

Post a Followup